From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [RFC] Wild and crazy ideas involving struct sk_buff Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <200708221631.34234.paul.moore@hp.com> <20070822212005.GR32236@postel.suug.ch> <200708221726.36783.paul.moore@hp.com> <20070822.143627.62367286.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: paul.moore@hp.com, tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from namei.org ([69.55.235.186]:50679 "EHLO us.intercode.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759341AbXHVWJn (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:09:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070822.143627.62367286.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote: > From: Paul Moore > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:26:36 -0400 > > > Was it just a thought, or was there some actual design/code/patchset > > to go along with it that described the idea? > > It was a thought mentioned at the first two netconfs, but it > went nowhere because the more we discussed the implementation > the more horrific it began to sound :-) Don't forget Rusty's skb reservation patches from 1999... -- James Morris