From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Wild and crazy ideas involving struct sk_buff
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0708221528220.20059@us.intercode.com.au>
References: <200708221631.34234.paul.moore@hp.com> <20070822.143627.62367286.davem@davemloft.net>
 <Xine.LNX.4.64.0708221506380.20059@us.intercode.com.au>
 <200708221820.56516.paul.moore@hp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, tgraf@suug.ch,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from namei.org ([69.55.235.186]:51211 "EHLO us.intercode.com.au"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1761273AbXHVWbU (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:31:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200708221820.56516.paul.moore@hp.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Paul Moore wrote:

> > Don't forget Rusty's skb reservation patches from 1999...
> 
> I'm guessing those would probably need to be forward ported just a teensy 
> weensy bit ;)

The point being that the idea has been around since last century and has 
never gone anywhere :-)


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>