Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: lan966x: Use automatic selection of VCAP rule actionset

[Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>]

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:29:07PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Since commit 81e164c4aec5 ("net: microchip: sparx5: Add automatic
> selection of VCAP rule actionset") the VCAP API has the capability to
> select automatically the actionset based on the actions that are attached
> to the rule. So it is not needed anymore to hardcore the actionset in the

I am sure, you've meant 'hardcode'

> driver, therefore it is OK to remove this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - improve the commit message by mentioning the commit which allows
>   to make this change
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> index bd10a71897418..f960727ecaeec 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c
> @@ -261,8 +261,6 @@ static int lan966x_tc_flower_add(struct lan966x_port *port,
>  							0);
>  			err |= vcap_rule_add_action_u32(vrule, VCAP_AF_MASK_MODE,
>  							LAN966X_PMM_REPLACE);
> -			err |= vcap_set_rule_set_actionset(vrule,
> -							   VCAP_AFS_BASE_TYPE);

Is this the only location, where this can be done? I'm not very familiar with 
this driver, would it maybe make sense to check out lan966x_ptp_add_trap() too?

>  			if (err)
>  				goto out;
>  
> -- 
> 2.38.0
>