From: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: ethernet: mediatek: ppe: add support for flow accounting
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 11:40:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2JXEfRDZO2oPoMT@makrotopia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221101204945.35edb8e6@kernel.org>
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 08:49:45PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 00:58:01 +0000 Daniel Golle wrote:
> > The PPE units found in MT7622 and newer support packet and byte
> > accounting of hw-offloaded flows. Add support for reading those
> > counters as found in MediaTek's SDK[1].
> >
> > [1]: https://git01.mediatek.com/plugins/gitiles/openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds/+/bc6a6a375c800dc2b80e1a325a2c732d1737df92
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
> > ---
> > v4: declare function mtk_mib_entry_read as static
> > v3: don't bother to set 'false' values in any zero-initialized struct
> > use mtk_foe_entry_ib2
> > both changes were requested by Felix Fietkau
> >
> > v2: fix wrong variable name in return value check spotted by Denis Kirjanov
>
> Please read the FAQ:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#tl-dr
I'm sorry for re-submitting the fixes to frequently. I'll give it more
time in future.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#running-all-the-builds-and-checks-locally-is-a-pain-can-i-post-my-patches-and-have-the-patchwork-bot-validate-them
>
It wasn't my intention to out-source testing to the patchwork bot.
I do run checks as recommended locally, which includes checkpatch.pl,
build and run-time testing. And though in this case an unneeded export
of a function was also indicated by my local compiler, I must have
missed it in the output of the kernel build. I will try to improve my
workflow in such a way that it will be less likely to miss new compiler
warnings.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-02 0:58 [PATCH v4] net: ethernet: mediatek: ppe: add support for flow accounting Daniel Golle
2022-11-02 3:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 11:40 ` Daniel Golle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2JXEfRDZO2oPoMT@makrotopia.org \
--to=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).