netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, moshe@nvidia.com,
	saeedm@nvidia.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 13/13] net: expose devlink port over rtnetlink
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 16:59:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2KT4A6ZGVfcbsfx@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102085249.3b64e29f@kernel.org>

Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 04:52:49PM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 16:37:00 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Maybe it's time to plumb policies thru to classic netlink, instead of
>> >> creating weird attribute constructs?  
>> >
>> >Not a blocker, FWIW, just pointing out a better alternative.  
>> 
>> Or, even better, move RTnetlink to generic netlink. Really, there is no
>> point to have it as non-generic netlink forever. We moved ethtool there,
>> why not RTnetlink?
>
>As a rewrite?  We could plug in the same callbacks into a genl family
>but the replies / notifications would have different headers depending
>on the socket type which gets hairy, no?

I mean like ethtool, completely side iface, independent, new attrs etc.
We can start with NetdevNetlink for example. Just cover netdev part of
RTNetlink. That is probably most interesting anyway.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-02 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-31 12:42 [patch net-next v3 00/13] net: fix netdev to devlink_port linkage and expose to user Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 01/13] net: devlink: convert devlink port type-specific pointers to union Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 02/13] net: devlink: move port_type_warn_schedule() call to __devlink_port_type_set() Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 03/13] net: devlink: move port_type_netdev_checks() " Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 04/13] net: devlink: take RTNL in port_fill() function only if it is not held Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 05/13] net: devlink: track netdev with devlink_port assigned Jiri Pirko
2022-11-01 16:25   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02  9:32     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 11:13     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 06/13] net: make drivers to use SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT to set devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 07/13] net: devlink: remove netdev arg from devlink_port_type_eth_set() Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 08/13] net: devlink: remove net namespace check from devlink_nl_port_fill() Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 09/13] net: devlink: store copy netdevice ifindex and ifname to allow port_fill() without RTNL held Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 10/13] net: devlink: add not cleared type warning to port unregister Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 11/13] net: devlink: use devlink_port pointer instead of ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 12/13] net: remove unused ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2022-10-31 12:42 ` [patch net-next v3 13/13] net: expose devlink port over rtnetlink Jiri Pirko
2022-11-01 16:18   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 11:22     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 15:10       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 15:13         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 15:37           ` Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 15:52             ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 15:59               ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2022-11-02 16:28                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-01 17:29 ` [patch net-next v3 00/13] net: fix netdev to devlink_port linkage and expose to user Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02  9:33   ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2KT4A6ZGVfcbsfx@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).