From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, tariqt@nvidia.com,
moshe@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v4 05/13] net: devlink: track netdev with devlink_port assigned
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 08:40:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2i2hTt2txFoo2aR@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2d51izTZV1rThOc@shredder>
Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 10:09:42AM CET, idosch@idosch.org wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 05:02:03PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> @@ -9645,10 +9649,13 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc_ns(const struct devlink_ops *ops,
>>
>> ret = xa_alloc_cyclic(&devlinks, &devlink->index, devlink, xa_limit_31b,
>> &last_id, GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> - kfree(devlink);
>> - return NULL;
>> - }
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto err_xa_alloc;
>> +
>> + devlink->netdevice_nb.notifier_call = devlink_netdevice_event;
>> + ret = register_netdevice_notifier_net(net, &devlink->netdevice_nb);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_register_netdevice_notifier;
>>
>> devlink->dev = dev;
>> devlink->ops = ops;
>> @@ -9675,6 +9682,12 @@ struct devlink *devlink_alloc_ns(const struct devlink_ops *ops,
>> init_completion(&devlink->comp);
>>
>> return devlink;
>> +
>> +err_register_netdevice_notifier:
>> + xa_erase(&devlinks, devlink->index);
>> +err_xa_alloc:
>> + kfree(devlink);
>> + return NULL;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_alloc_ns);
>>
>> @@ -9828,6 +9841,10 @@ void devlink_free(struct devlink *devlink)
>> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list));
>>
>> xa_destroy(&devlink->snapshot_ids);
>> +
>> + unregister_netdevice_notifier_net(devlink_net(devlink),
>> + &devlink->netdevice_nb);
>> +
>> xa_erase(&devlinks, devlink->index);
>>
>> kfree(devlink);
>
>The network namespace of the devlink instance can change throughout the
>lifetime of the devlink instance, but the notifier block is always
>registered in the initial namespace. This leads to
>unregister_netdevice_notifier_net() failing to unregister the notifier
>block, which leads to use-after-free. Reproduce (with KASAN enabled):
>
># echo "10 0" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device
># ip netns add bla
># devlink dev reload netdevsim/netdevsim10 netns bla
># echo 10 > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device
># ip link add dummy10 up type dummy
>
>I see two possible solutions:
>
>1. Use register_netdevice_notifier() instead of
>register_netdevice_notifier_net().
>
>2. Move the notifier block to the correct namespace in devlink_reload().
Yep, this was my intension, slipped my mind. Thanks! Will send a
follow-up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-02 16:01 [patch net-next v4 00/13] net: fix netdev to devlink_port linkage and expose to user Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:01 ` [patch net-next v4 01/13] net: devlink: convert devlink port type-specific pointers to union Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 02/13] net: devlink: move port_type_warn_schedule() call to __devlink_port_type_set() Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 03/13] net: devlink: move port_type_netdev_checks() " Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 04/13] net: devlink: take RTNL in port_fill() function only if it is not held Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 05/13] net: devlink: track netdev with devlink_port assigned Jiri Pirko
2022-11-06 9:09 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-11-07 7:40 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 06/13] net: make drivers to use SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT to set devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 07/13] net: devlink: remove netdev arg from devlink_port_type_eth_set() Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 08/13] net: devlink: remove net namespace check from devlink_nl_port_fill() Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 09/13] net: devlink: store copy netdevice ifindex and ifname to allow port_fill() without RTNL held Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 10/13] net: devlink: add not cleared type warning to port unregister Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 11/13] net: devlink: use devlink_port pointer instead of ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 12/13] net: remove unused ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2022-11-02 16:02 ` [patch net-next v4 13/13] net: expose devlink port over rtnetlink Jiri Pirko
2022-11-04 5:00 ` [patch net-next v4 00/13] net: fix netdev to devlink_port linkage and expose to user patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2i2hTt2txFoo2aR@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).