Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	dev@openvswitch.org, ovs-dev@openvswitch.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>,
	Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>,
	Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
	Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 5/5] net: move the nat function to nf_nat_ovs for ovs and tc
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 12:09:55 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y343wyO20XUvwuvg@t14s.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf19487f4dfc8cd91a4395672d9905b10917128d.1669138256.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:32:21PM -0500, Xin Long wrote:
> +int nf_ct_nat(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
> +	      enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo, int *action,
> +	      const struct nf_nat_range2 *range, bool commit)
> +{
> +	enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype;
> +	int err, ct_action = *action;
> +
> +	*action = 0;
> +
> +	/* Add NAT extension if not confirmed yet. */
> +	if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct) && !nf_ct_nat_ext_add(ct))
> +		return NF_ACCEPT;   /* Can't NAT. */
> +
> +	if (ctinfo != IP_CT_NEW && (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK) &&
> +	    (ctinfo != IP_CT_RELATED || commit)) {
> +		/* NAT an established or related connection like before. */
> +		if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
> +			/* This is the REPLY direction for a connection
> +			 * for which NAT was applied in the forward
> +			 * direction.  Do the reverse NAT.
> +			 */
> +			maniptype = ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT
> +				? NF_NAT_MANIP_DST : NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
> +		else
> +			maniptype = ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT
> +				? NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC : NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
> +	} else if (ct_action & (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)) {
> +		maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
> +	} else if (ct_action & (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_DST)) {
> +		maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
> +	} else {
> +		return NF_ACCEPT;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = nf_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, action, range, maniptype);
> +	if (err == NF_ACCEPT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
> +		if (ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT) {
> +			if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
> +				maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
> +			else
> +				maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
> +
> +			err = nf_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, action, range,
> +						maniptype);
> +		} else if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) {
> +			err = nf_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, action, NULL,
> +						NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_nat);
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
> index cc643a556ea1..d03c75165663 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
> @@ -726,144 +726,27 @@ static void ovs_nat_update_key(struct sw_flow_key *key,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -/* Modelled after nf_nat_ipv[46]_fn().
> - * range is only used for new, uninitialized NAT state.
> - * Returns either NF_ACCEPT or NF_DROP.
> - */
> -static int ovs_ct_nat_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
> -			      enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo,
> -			      const struct nf_nat_range2 *range,
> -			      enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype, struct sw_flow_key *key)
> -{
> -	int hooknum, err = NF_ACCEPT;
> -
> -	/* See HOOK2MANIP(). */
> -	if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
> -		hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_IN; /* Source NAT */
> -	else
> -		hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT; /* Destination NAT */
> -
> -	switch (ctinfo) {
> -	case IP_CT_RELATED:
> -	case IP_CT_RELATED_REPLY:
> -		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) &&
> -		    skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
> -		    ip_hdr(skb)->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP) {
> -			if (!nf_nat_icmp_reply_translation(skb, ct, ctinfo,
> -							   hooknum))
> -				err = NF_DROP;
> -			goto out;
> -		} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) &&
> -			   skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
> -			__be16 frag_off;
> -			u8 nexthdr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->nexthdr;
> -			int hdrlen = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb,
> -						      sizeof(struct ipv6hdr),
> -						      &nexthdr, &frag_off);
> -
> -			if (hdrlen >= 0 && nexthdr == IPPROTO_ICMPV6) {
> -				if (!nf_nat_icmpv6_reply_translation(skb, ct,
> -								     ctinfo,
> -								     hooknum,
> -								     hdrlen))
> -					err = NF_DROP;
> -				goto out;
> -			}
> -		}
> -		/* Non-ICMP, fall thru to initialize if needed. */
> -		fallthrough;
> -	case IP_CT_NEW:
> -		/* Seen it before?  This can happen for loopback, retrans,
> -		 * or local packets.
> -		 */
> -		if (!nf_nat_initialized(ct, maniptype)) {
> -			/* Initialize according to the NAT action. */
> -			err = (range && range->flags & NF_NAT_RANGE_MAP_IPS)
> -				/* Action is set up to establish a new
> -				 * mapping.
> -				 */
> -				? nf_nat_setup_info(ct, range, maniptype)
> -				: nf_nat_alloc_null_binding(ct, hooknum);
> -			if (err != NF_ACCEPT)
> -				goto out;
> -		}
> -		break;
> -
> -	case IP_CT_ESTABLISHED:
> -	case IP_CT_ESTABLISHED_REPLY:
> -		break;
> -
> -	default:
> -		err = NF_DROP;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	err = nf_nat_packet(ct, ctinfo, hooknum, skb);
> -out:
> -	/* Update the flow key if NAT successful. */
> -	if (err == NF_ACCEPT)
> -		ovs_nat_update_key(key, skb, maniptype);
> -
> -	return err;
> -}
> -
>  /* Returns NF_DROP if the packet should be dropped, NF_ACCEPT otherwise. */
>  static int ovs_ct_nat(struct net *net, struct sw_flow_key *key,
>  		      const struct ovs_conntrack_info *info,
>  		      struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
>  		      enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo)
>  {
> -	enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype;
> -	int err;
> +	int err, action = 0;
>  
>  	if (!(info->nat & OVS_CT_NAT))
>  		return NF_ACCEPT;
> +	if (info->nat & OVS_CT_SRC_NAT)
> +		action |= (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> +	if (info->nat & OVS_CT_DST_NAT)
> +		action |= (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);

I'm wondering why this dance at this level with supporting multiple
MANIPs while actually only one can be used at a time.

act_ct will reject an action using both:
        if ((p->ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT_SRC) &&
            (p->ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT_DST)) {
                NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "dnat and snat can't be enabled at the same time");
                return -EOPNOTSUPP;

I couldn't find this kind of check in ovs code right now (didn't look much, I
confess :)), but even the code here was already doing:

-	} else if (info->nat & OVS_CT_SRC_NAT) {
-		maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
-	} else if (info->nat & OVS_CT_DST_NAT) {
-		maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;

And in case of tuple conflict, maniptype will be forcibly updated in
[*] below.

Anyhow, if really needed, it would be nice to use BIT(NF_NAT_MANIP_..)
instead.

>  
> -	/* Add NAT extension if not confirmed yet. */
> -	if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct) && !nf_ct_nat_ext_add(ct))
> -		return NF_ACCEPT;   /* Can't NAT. */
> +	err = nf_ct_nat(skb, ct, ctinfo, &action, &info->range, info->commit);
>  
> -	/* Determine NAT type.
> -	 * Check if the NAT type can be deduced from the tracked connection.
> -	 * Make sure new expected connections (IP_CT_RELATED) are NATted only
> -	 * when committing.
> -	 */
> -	if (ctinfo != IP_CT_NEW && ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK &&
> -	    (ctinfo != IP_CT_RELATED || info->commit)) {
> -		/* NAT an established or related connection like before. */
> -		if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
> -			/* This is the REPLY direction for a connection
> -			 * for which NAT was applied in the forward
> -			 * direction.  Do the reverse NAT.
> -			 */
> -			maniptype = ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT
> -				? NF_NAT_MANIP_DST : NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
> -		else
> -			maniptype = ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT
> -				? NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC : NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
> -	} else if (info->nat & OVS_CT_SRC_NAT) {
> -		maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
> -	} else if (info->nat & OVS_CT_DST_NAT) {
> -		maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
> -	} else {
> -		return NF_ACCEPT; /* Connection is not NATed. */
> -	}
> -	err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, &info->range, maniptype, key);
> -
> -	if (err == NF_ACCEPT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
> -		if (ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT) {
> -			if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
> -				maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
> -			else
> -				maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;

[*]

> -
> -			err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, &info->range,
> -						 maniptype, key);
> -		} else if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) {
> -			err = ovs_ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, NULL,
> -						 NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC, key);
> -		}
> -	}
> +	if (action & (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC))
> +		ovs_nat_update_key(key, skb, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> +	if (action & (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_DST))
> +		ovs_nat_update_key(key, skb, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
>  
>  	return err;
>  }
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> index c7782c9a6ab6..0c410220239f 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> @@ -863,90 +863,6 @@ static void tcf_ct_params_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
>  	tcf_ct_params_free(params);
>  }
>  
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
> -/* Modelled after nf_nat_ipv[46]_fn().
> - * range is only used for new, uninitialized NAT state.
> - * Returns either NF_ACCEPT or NF_DROP.
> - */
> -static int ct_nat_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
> -			  enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo,
> -			  const struct nf_nat_range2 *range,
> -			  enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype)
> -{
> -	__be16 proto = skb_protocol(skb, true);
> -	int hooknum, err = NF_ACCEPT;
> -
> -	/* See HOOK2MANIP(). */
> -	if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
> -		hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_IN; /* Source NAT */
> -	else
> -		hooknum = NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT; /* Destination NAT */
> -
> -	switch (ctinfo) {
> -	case IP_CT_RELATED:
> -	case IP_CT_RELATED_REPLY:
> -		if (proto == htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
> -		    ip_hdr(skb)->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP) {
> -			if (!nf_nat_icmp_reply_translation(skb, ct, ctinfo,
> -							   hooknum))
> -				err = NF_DROP;
> -			goto out;
> -		} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && proto == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
> -			__be16 frag_off;
> -			u8 nexthdr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->nexthdr;
> -			int hdrlen = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb,
> -						      sizeof(struct ipv6hdr),
> -						      &nexthdr, &frag_off);
> -
> -			if (hdrlen >= 0 && nexthdr == IPPROTO_ICMPV6) {
> -				if (!nf_nat_icmpv6_reply_translation(skb, ct,
> -								     ctinfo,
> -								     hooknum,
> -								     hdrlen))
> -					err = NF_DROP;
> -				goto out;
> -			}
> -		}
> -		/* Non-ICMP, fall thru to initialize if needed. */
> -		fallthrough;
> -	case IP_CT_NEW:
> -		/* Seen it before?  This can happen for loopback, retrans,
> -		 * or local packets.
> -		 */
> -		if (!nf_nat_initialized(ct, maniptype)) {
> -			/* Initialize according to the NAT action. */
> -			err = (range && range->flags & NF_NAT_RANGE_MAP_IPS)
> -				/* Action is set up to establish a new
> -				 * mapping.
> -				 */
> -				? nf_nat_setup_info(ct, range, maniptype)
> -				: nf_nat_alloc_null_binding(ct, hooknum);
> -			if (err != NF_ACCEPT)
> -				goto out;
> -		}
> -		break;
> -
> -	case IP_CT_ESTABLISHED:
> -	case IP_CT_ESTABLISHED_REPLY:
> -		break;
> -
> -	default:
> -		err = NF_DROP;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	err = nf_nat_packet(ct, ctinfo, hooknum, skb);
> -out:
> -	if (err == NF_ACCEPT) {
> -		if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
> -			tc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct_snat = 1;
> -		if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_DST)
> -			tc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct_dnat = 1;
> -	}
> -	return err;
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_NF_NAT */
> -
>  static void tcf_ct_act_set_mark(struct nf_conn *ct, u32 mark, u32 mask)
>  {
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK)
> @@ -986,52 +902,22 @@ static int tcf_ct_act_nat(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  			  bool commit)
>  {
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
> -	int err;
> -	enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype;
> +	int err, action = 0;
>  
>  	if (!(ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT))
>  		return NF_ACCEPT;
> +	if (ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT_SRC)
> +		action |= (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> +	if (ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT_DST)
> +		action |= (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
>  
> -	/* Add NAT extension if not confirmed yet. */
> -	if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct) && !nf_ct_nat_ext_add(ct))
> -		return NF_ACCEPT;   /* Can't NAT. */
> -
> -	if (ctinfo != IP_CT_NEW && (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK) &&
> -	    (ctinfo != IP_CT_RELATED || commit)) {
> -		/* NAT an established or related connection like before. */
> -		if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
> -			/* This is the REPLY direction for a connection
> -			 * for which NAT was applied in the forward
> -			 * direction.  Do the reverse NAT.
> -			 */
> -			maniptype = ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT
> -				? NF_NAT_MANIP_DST : NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
> -		else
> -			maniptype = ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT
> -				? NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC : NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
> -	} else if (ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT_SRC) {
> -		maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
> -	} else if (ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT_DST) {
> -		maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
> -	} else {
> -		return NF_ACCEPT;
> -	}
> +	err = nf_ct_nat(skb, ct, ctinfo, &action, range, commit);
> +
> +	if (action & (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC))
> +		tc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct_snat = 1;
> +	if (action & (1 << NF_NAT_MANIP_DST))
> +		tc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct_dnat = 1;
>  
> -	err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
> -	if (err == NF_ACCEPT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
> -		if (ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT) {
> -			if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
> -				maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
> -			else
> -				maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
> -
> -			err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range,
> -					     maniptype);
> -		} else if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) {
> -			err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, NULL,
> -					     NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
> -		}
> -	}
>  	return err;
>  #else
>  	return NF_ACCEPT;
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-23 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-22 17:32 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] net: eliminate the duplicate code in the ct nat functions of ovs and tc Xin Long
2022-11-22 17:32 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/5] openvswitch: delete the unncessary skb_pull_rcsum call in ovs_ct_nat_execute Xin Long
2022-11-22 17:32 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/5] openvswitch: return NF_ACCEPT when OVS_CT_NAT is net set in info nat Xin Long
2022-11-23 14:24   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-22 17:32 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 3/5] net: sched: return NF_ACCEPT when fails to add nat ext in tcf_ct_act_nat Xin Long
2022-11-23 14:23   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-12-01 16:53     ` Xin Long
2022-11-22 17:32 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 4/5] net: sched: update the nat flag for icmp error packets in ct_nat_execute Xin Long
2022-11-22 17:32 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 5/5] net: move the nat function to nf_nat_ovs for ovs and tc Xin Long
2022-11-23 15:09   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2022-11-23 15:13     ` [ovs-dev] " Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-23 17:31       ` Xin Long
2022-11-23 18:48         ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-23 18:54           ` Xin Long
2022-11-23 19:17             ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-23 19:55               ` Xin Long
2022-11-23 21:21                 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-23 21:34                   ` Xin Long
2022-12-01 21:37                     ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-24 10:00                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-11-23 18:52   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-12-01 16:26     ` Xin Long
2022-11-23 12:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] net: eliminate the duplicate code in the ct nat functions of " Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y343wyO20XUvwuvg@t14s.localdomain \
    --to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ovs-dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=ozsh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox