From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RTM_DELROUTE not sent anymore when deleting (last) nexthop of routes in 6.1
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:41:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y39me56NhhPYewYK@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOiHx==ddZr6mvvbzgoAwwhJW76qGNVOcNsTG-6m79Ch+=aA5Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:20:00AM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when an IPv4 route gets removed because its nexthop was deleted, the
> kernel does not send a RTM_DELROUTE netlink notifications anymore in
> 6.1. A bisect lead me to 61b91eb33a69 ("ipv4: Handle attempt to delete
> multipath route when fib_info contains an nh reference"), and
> reverting it makes it work again.
>
> It can be reproduced by doing the following and listening to netlink
> (e.g. via ip monitor)
>
> ip a a 172.16.1.1/24 dev veth1
> ip nexthop add id 100 via 172.16.1.2 dev veth1
> ip route add 172.16.101.0/24 nhid 100
> ip nexthop del id 100
>
> where the nexthop del will trigger a RTM_DELNEXTHOP message, but no
> RTM_DELROUTE, but the route is gone afterwards anyways.
I tried the reproducer and I get the same notifications in ip monitor
regardless of whether 61b91eb33a69 is reverted or not.
Looking at the code and thinking about it, I don't think we ever
generated RTM_DELROUTE notifications when IPv4 routes were flushed (to
avoid a notification storm).
Are you running an upstream kernel?
Thanks
>
> Doing the same thing with IPv6 still works as expected
>
> ip a a 2001:db8:91::1/64 dev veth1
> ip nexthop add id 100 via 2001:db8:91::2 dev veth1
> ip route add 2001:db8:101::/64 nhid 100
> ip nexthop del id 100
>
> Here the kernel will send out both the RTM_DELNEXTHOP and the
> RTM_DELROUTE netlink messages.
>
> Unfortunately my net-foo is not good enough to propose a fix.
>
> Best regards
> Jonas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-24 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-24 9:20 RTM_DELROUTE not sent anymore when deleting (last) nexthop of routes in 6.1 Jonas Gorski
2022-11-24 12:41 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2022-11-24 14:15 ` Jonas Gorski
2022-11-24 14:40 ` Jonas Gorski
2022-11-24 14:50 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-11-24 15:20 ` Jonas Gorski
2022-11-24 16:04 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-11-24 16:58 ` Jonas Gorski
2022-11-25 3:53 ` David Ahern
2022-11-25 8:36 ` RTM_DELROUTE not sent anymore when deleting (last) nexthop of routes in 6.1 #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-11-27 12:08 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-11-29 8:50 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y39me56NhhPYewYK@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=jonas.gorski@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).