From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@huawei.com>
Cc: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>,
Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sfc: fix potential memleak in __ef100_hard_start_xmit()
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:36:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3YctdnKDDvikQcl@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1668671409-10909-1-git-send-email-zhangchangzhong@huawei.com>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:50:09PM +0800, Zhang Changzhong wrote:
> The __ef100_hard_start_xmit() returns NETDEV_TX_OK without freeing skb
> in error handling case, add dev_kfree_skb_any() to fix it.
>
> Fixes: 51b35a454efd ("sfc: skeleton EF100 PF driver")
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c
> index 88fa295..ddcc325 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c
> @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ netdev_tx_t __ef100_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> skb->len, skb->data_len, channel->channel);
> if (!efx->n_channels || !efx->n_tx_channels || !channel) {
> netif_stop_queue(net_dev);
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> goto err;
> }
ef100 doesn't release in __ef100_enqueue_skb() either. SKB shouldn't be
NULL or ERR at this stage.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_tx.c
index 29ffaf35559d..426706b91d02 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_tx.c
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ int __ef100_enqueue_skb(struct efx_tx_queue *tx_queue, struct sk_buff *skb,
err:
efx_enqueue_unwind(tx_queue, old_insert_count);
- if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(skb))
+ if (rc)
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
/* If we're not expecting another transmit and we had something to push
>
> --
> 2.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 7:50 [PATCH net] sfc: fix potential memleak in __ef100_hard_start_xmit() Zhang Changzhong
2022-11-17 11:36 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-11-17 12:41 ` Zhang Changzhong
2022-11-17 13:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-18 9:15 ` Martin Habets
2022-11-18 11:53 ` Zhang Changzhong
2022-11-18 17:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-22 8:28 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-11-22 9:47 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-18 9:13 ` Martin Habets
2022-11-22 10:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3YctdnKDDvikQcl@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=zhangchangzhong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).