From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH xfrm-next v7 6/8] xfrm: speed-up lookup of HW policies
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:21:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3t7aSUBPXPoR8VD@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121121040.GY704954@gauss3.secunet.de>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 01:10:40PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 01:34:30PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, my bad. But why can't we drop all packets that don't have HW
> > state? Why do we need to add larval?
>
> The first packet of a flow tiggers an acquire and inserts a larval
> state. On a traffic triggered connection, we need this to get
> a state with keys installed.
>
> We need this larval state then, because that tells us we sent already an
> acquire to userspace. All subsequent packets of that flow will be
> dropped without sending another acquire. Otherwise each subsequent
> packet will generate another acquire until the keys are negotiated.
> If a flow starts sending on a high rate, this would be not so nice
> for userspace :)
The thing is that this SW acquire flow is a fraction case, as it applies
to locally generated traffic.
In my mind, there are other cases, like eswitch mode and tunnel mode. In
these cases, the packets are arrived to HW without even passing SW stack.
What we want to do is to catch in HW all TX packets, which don't have SAs
(applicable for all types of traffic), mark them and route back to the
driver. The driver will be responsible to talk with XFRM core to
generate acquire.
The same logic of rerouting packets is required for audit and will be done
later. Right now, we rely on *swan implementations which configure everything
in advance.
Also larval is default to 1 (drop) in all distros.
I hope that this larval/acquire is not must for this series to be merged.
And it is going to be implemented later as I'm assigned to work on this
offload feature till feature complete :).
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-21 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-09 12:54 [PATCH xfrm-next v7 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow packet offload configuration Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-09 12:54 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v7 1/8] xfrm: add new packet offload flag Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-09 12:54 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v7 2/8] xfrm: allow state packet offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-09 12:54 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v7 3/8] xfrm: add an interface to offload policy Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-09 12:54 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v7 4/8] xfrm: add TX datapath support for IPsec packet offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-17 11:59 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-17 12:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-18 10:23 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-21 11:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-09 12:54 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v7 5/8] xfrm: add RX datapath protection " Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-09 12:54 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v7 6/8] xfrm: speed-up lookup of HW policies Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-17 12:12 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-17 12:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-18 10:49 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-20 19:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-21 9:44 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-21 10:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-21 11:09 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-21 11:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-21 11:25 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-21 11:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-21 12:02 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-21 12:43 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-21 13:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-22 13:10 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-22 13:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-23 8:37 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-23 9:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-23 12:53 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-24 11:07 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-25 6:23 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-21 12:10 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-21 13:21 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-11-22 4:29 ` Herbert Xu
2022-11-22 6:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-22 13:00 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-22 13:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-23 8:23 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-23 10:25 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-09 12:54 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v7 7/8] xfrm: add support to HW update soft and hard limits Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-17 12:13 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-17 12:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-09 12:54 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v7 8/8] xfrm: document IPsec packet offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-17 12:15 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-17 12:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-15 18:09 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v7 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow packet offload configuration Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-15 18:30 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-15 19:00 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-16 23:07 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-11-17 12:20 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-11-17 12:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3t7aSUBPXPoR8VD@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).