From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74D2C352A1 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235545AbiLFRNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:13:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48266 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235523AbiLFRNT (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:13:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67922272E; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:13:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id w4-20020a17090ac98400b002186f5d7a4cso18671320pjt.0; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:13:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MNTmn4Ppp22XNGK2CIb4/9yQLF2i0XM6RqxIH3zvJQc=; b=SvdgCisjFp/nziYy9m+QZ+pn8qZRGnLTVAkKzitorYutPwQLt6+ipo8IsJrizeEtq1 Ls/fbizT+P25x3BQMlmNbQ6LbeN2NiSNKhb6ILvXLD11IctDzo7ozrHJAFULOJkz//KP BHU9HVSm0bU58l748mY2viuvFdzXZT1ta5M+r14WElKfq0ZH726xw0tC/AMUUyEH1RIy pKyAXKTXXqaRxYFqb5R5uezgTqi4hMZ9LEAQ1gzQ/fTpa17YCV34tvbm/mIBaT6+SahD oYmzaXmk6ByKtzYYLOeQCAV9uwBdbMrW4oYkN2r749frt+m9TWFbUKxrG+fhqsz1ZkqC iAOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=MNTmn4Ppp22XNGK2CIb4/9yQLF2i0XM6RqxIH3zvJQc=; b=Ury/hoamZeVS7fjiH6SU5maqcIkjtEcxiHdiTDYLeLc5F75f+sySf7M97KdmDSpeqY V9UumVee0TRBrTeit/GzYeXVuhe+7RPlSH7WAQarJS7s61jZFq9OVQcdUWt3sEqAPotN MJCbvkQYg5GZ/h39VMJbLilcbWeUjMYp0Fqi8hEnFeVr//FDSeOnLQJ0nvaEH8Vy2x1L FHqLE1PtXUP3ieH8xsPypBkeBk45pP3LGBmOoQVJEsJnI3oH1CKcv1SjHoHDc5hG/hLy cO1BbPaOVw31b9jBF/goIztCzITgNforGAS0SjfBMmJ1GJt8ttZH1HCST6TkAaqHwCTR Kj+g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnsMntivWOLkahnvKw3gU4UgP859t0GoalFPTlJTlxtFbRWNvKy bIHXfH4Bq+3eMNxsuQs5j44= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7qytCU0cuB63i3d9xtAkcgDKJgc/IXkjlQg5k+IzGKNzyl6P3OQwWJVW5PrzeB2vPKS23QdA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c104:b0:189:a931:c8a1 with SMTP id 4-20020a170902c10400b00189a931c8a1mr32927272pli.112.1670346797784; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:13:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-73-164-155-12.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [73.164.155.12]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i20-20020a170902e49400b00168dadc7354sm12875922ple.78.2022.12.06.09.13.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:13:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:02:54 +0000 From: Bobby Eshleman To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Stefano Garzarella , Bobby Eshleman , Cong Wang , Jiang Wang , Krasnov Arseniy , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff Message-ID: References: <20221202173520.10428-1-bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com> <20221205122214.bky3oxipck4hsqqe@sgarzare-redhat> <20221205173735.6123b941@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221205173735.6123b941@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 05:37:35PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:22:14 +0100 Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > As pointed out in v4, this is net-next material, so you should use the > > net-next tag and base the patch on the net-next tree: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.0/process/maintainer-netdev.html#netdev-faq > > Thanks, yes, please try to do that, makes it much less likely that > the patch will be mishandled or lost. > > > I locally applied the patch on net-next and everything is fine, so maybe > > the maintainers can apply it, otherwise you should resend it with the > > right tag. > > FWIW looks like all the automated guessing kicked in correctly here, > so no need to repost just for the subject tag (this time). > > > Ah, in that case I suggest you send it before the next merge window > > opens (I guess next week), because net-next closes and you'll have to > > wait for the next cycle. > > +1, we'll try to take a closer look & apply tomorrow unless someone > speaks up. Thanks all, I'll be sure to do that in the future.