From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, yangyingliang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 0/7] devlink: make sure devlink port registers/unregisters only for registered instance
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:00:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y43BIXPBAikNiGRH@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4yGCTMyV2bdD+05@unreal>
Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 12:35:37PM CET, leon@kernel.org wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:46:01PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>
><...>
>
>> Jiri Pirko (7):
>> devlink: Reorder devlink_port_register/unregister() calls to be done
>> when devlink is registered
>> netdevsim: Reorder devl_port_register/unregister() calls to be done
>> when devlink is registered
>> mlxsw: Reorder devl_port_register/unregister() calls to be done when
>> devlink is registered
>> nfp: Reorder devl_port_register/unregister() calls to be done when
>> devlink is registered
>> mlx4: Reorder devl_port_register/unregister() calls to be done when
>> devlink is registered
>> mlx5: Reorder devl_port_register/unregister() calls to be done when
>> devlink is registered
>> devlink: assert if devl_port_register/unregister() is called on
>> unregistered devlink instance
>
>Thanks, it is more clear now what you wanted.
>Everything here looks ok, but can you please find better titles for the
>commit messages? They are too long.
Okay, will try.
>
>Not related to the series, but spotted during the code review,
>It will be nice if you can get rid of devlink_port->registered and rely
>xarray marks for that. It will be cleaner and aligned with devlink object.
Okay, will look into it and address in a separate patch/patchset.
Thanks!
>
>Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 16:46 [patch net-next RFC 0/7] devlink: make sure devlink port registers/unregisters only for registered instance Jiri Pirko
2022-12-01 16:46 ` [patch net-next RFC 1/7] devlink: Reorder devlink_port_register/unregister() calls to be done when devlink is registered Jiri Pirko
2022-12-01 16:46 ` [patch net-next RFC 2/7] netdevsim: Reorder devl_port_register/unregister() " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-01 16:46 ` [patch net-next RFC 3/7] mlxsw: " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-01 16:46 ` [patch net-next RFC 4/7] nfp: " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-01 16:46 ` [patch net-next RFC 5/7] mlx4: " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-01 16:46 ` [patch net-next RFC 6/7] mlx5: " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-01 16:46 ` [patch net-next RFC 7/7] devlink: assert if devl_port_register/unregister() is called on unregistered devlink instance Jiri Pirko
2022-12-04 11:40 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-05 9:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-04 11:35 ` [patch net-next RFC 0/7] devlink: make sure devlink port registers/unregisters only for registered instance Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-05 10:00 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y43BIXPBAikNiGRH@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox