From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v2] net: mvneta: Fix an out of bounds check
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:06:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5A7d1E5ccwHTYPf@kadam> (raw)
In an earlier commit, I added a bounds check to prevent an out of bounds
read and a WARN(). On further discussion and consideration that check
was probably too aggressive. Instead of returning -EINVAL, a better fix
would be to just prevent the out of bounds read but continue the process.
Background: The value of "pp->rxq_def" is a number between 0-7 by default,
or even higher depending on the value of "rxq_number", which is a module
parameter. If the value is more than the number of available CPUs then
it will trigger the WARN() in cpu_max_bits_warn().
Fixes: e8b4fc13900b ("net: mvneta: Prevent out of bounds read in mvneta_config_rss()")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
---
v2: fix the subject to say net instead of net-next.
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index 66b7f27c9a48..5aefaaff0871 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -4271,7 +4271,7 @@ static void mvneta_percpu_elect(struct mvneta_port *pp)
/* Use the cpu associated to the rxq when it is online, in all
* the other cases, use the cpu 0 which can't be offline.
*/
- if (cpu_online(pp->rxq_def))
+ if (pp->rxq_def < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(pp->rxq_def))
elected_cpu = pp->rxq_def;
max_cpu = num_present_cpus();
@@ -4927,9 +4927,6 @@ static int mvneta_config_rss(struct mvneta_port *pp)
napi_disable(&pp->napi);
}
- if (pp->indir[0] >= nr_cpu_ids)
- return -EINVAL;
-
pp->rxq_def = pp->indir[0];
/* Update unicast mapping */
--
2.35.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-07 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 7:06 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2022-12-07 9:01 ` [PATCH net v2] net: mvneta: Fix an out of bounds check Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-08 17:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5A7d1E5ccwHTYPf@kadam \
--to=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).