From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE353C352A1 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 13:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229938AbiLGN2Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 08:28:25 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229956AbiLGN2Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 08:28:24 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 349ED3B9D5 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 05:28:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id m18so12430021eji.5 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 05:28:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mrZ3BGsfaA32811go0kCKtKR+PUZof+SC4fHx7E1Rus=; b=nmUd9khxZnwExuxkqPp8/QfSy3uUl1d1E0Gi57Xrw9cSYQ3s7dCr1MIlKz6och0sW9 XKRK1NJjONY97Sy1Z9XAZhUVdEA8n4RsRZoID4y0qPyPGEMwJzo+rnQe+1jATQc/upe9 jf7I8nKgtJdprOMJFd/HFtka3+aXpsXgiBCt+NH7U7J9O4hgE0d2+qYl8EJ6/lJCFrpz kK+NWeYv6xhWIlexmrRiKnVbT4lBkU3oe7B0JNffKH66eEiwn8aJRXT/K/GU7tXdvX/c 2TanbEYcfjIfY/VH8SzqZVdugHfrlnctOpcxwVNH7KKGyr3pucUxUnvfroQSrczQVMmQ xdCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mrZ3BGsfaA32811go0kCKtKR+PUZof+SC4fHx7E1Rus=; b=QyvqG/u8PNDF7YNrRvgnYoRyQi1Ltw05DIv0raGqLjBsio1ptuRpSO9TD50rcD5PtH qoJgeov57TXAZdo9TsVdrJPj0x+hVBC3DbPNTeivdM9xK6zcU/NUislPlLEs1ePHD4Iu /LsLLQKWfUB0+1zlarUK9nDYhS3o75Oj+rhttgW/pLahiGKpONXeRBz/fFIs0CwG/rIR a3dj0R5zkn6tpr/XNDiP5m3k93bm1ryNYzZyGaAJdoc19Ny09fVjlKJmhOkQjQCsn4q/ 4MT6D8/pYHtYzPFAUITK+w7u29FgLu0D9q1sBIKWBi95L58MAqszULd0mjAjMIU9/4bH a7SA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pm/NElme375e2Y4s2o+S6YwOkCpqSSIlMcYhS5KQhtbR8+Tt+9I Jh0pDGjvvI1bd2msEPj1gUFeOw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5y3GZ6RJJUHAc13DXeDPm82KLE0rrb8kerhA7uBIfNc59g5jJH7chDXlN2F6mK12Xg/2eMxQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5583:b0:78d:b3ef:656c with SMTP id y3-20020a170906558300b0078db3ef656cmr58684353ejp.627.1670419700812; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 05:28:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (host-213-179-129-39.customer.m-online.net. [213.179.129.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k2-20020a170906680200b0077077c62cadsm8437961ejr.31.2022.12.07.05.28.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Dec 2022 05:28:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 14:28:19 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com, ioana.ciornei@nxp.com, dmichail@fungible.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, tchornyi@marvell.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com, petrm@nvidia.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, simon.horman@corigine.com, shannon.nelson@amd.com, brett.creeley@amd.com Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/8] devlink: make sure devlink port registers/unregisters only for registered instance Message-ID: References: <20221205152257.454610-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20221205170826.17c78e90@kernel.org> <20221206121226.21de7ca3@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221206121226.21de7ca3@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 09:12:26PM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote: >On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 08:44:16 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote: >>> I didn't reply because I don't have much to add beyond what >>> I've already said too many times. I prefer to move to my >>> initial full refcounting / full locking design. I haven't posted >>> any patches because I figured it's too low priority and too risky >>> to be doing right before the merge window. >> >> I'm missing how what you describe is relevant to this patchset and to >> the issue it is trying to solve :/ >> >>> I agree that reordering is a good idea but not as a fix, and hopefully >> >> I don't see other way to fix the netdev/devlink events ordering problem >> I described above. Do you? > >Just hold off with your patches until I post mine. Which as I said will >be during/after the merge window. I've been explaining this for a year now. Sure, no problem.