netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@nvidia.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"atenart@kernel.org" <atenart@kernel.org>,
	"jiri@resnulli.us" <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macsec: add support for IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD in macsec_changelink
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 23:03:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5ENwSv4Q+A4O6lG@hog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IA1PR12MB635345D00CDE8F81721EEC89AB1A9@IA1PR12MB6353.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

2022-12-07, 15:52:15 +0000, Emeel Hakim wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2022 17:46
> > To: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>;
> > davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org;
> > pabeni@redhat.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org; atenart@kernel.org; jiri@resnulli.us
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macsec: add support for
> > IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD in macsec_changelink
> > 
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> > 
> > 
> > 2022-12-07, 12:10:16 +0200, ehakim@nvidia.com wrote:
> > [...]
> > > +static int macsec_changelink_upd_offload(struct net_device *dev,
> > > +struct nlattr *data[]) {
> > > +     enum macsec_offload offload;
> > > +     struct macsec_dev *macsec;
> > > +
> > > +     macsec = macsec_priv(dev);
> > > +     offload = nla_get_u8(data[IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD]);
> > 
> > All those checks are also present in macsec_upd_offload, why not move them into
> > macsec_update_offload as well? (and then you don't really need
> > macsec_changelink_upd_offload anymore)
> > 
> 
> Right, I thought about it , but I realized that those checks are done before holding the lock in macsec_upd_offload
> and if I move them to macsec_update_offload I will hold the lock for a longer time , I want to minimize the time
> of holding the lock.

Those couple of tests are probably lost in the noise compared to what
mdo_add_secy ends up doing. It also looks like a race condition
between the "macsec->offload == offload" test in macsec_upd_offload
(outside rtnl_lock) and updating macsec->offload via macsec_changelink
is possible. (Currently we can only change it with macsec_upd_offload
(called under genl_lock) so there's no issue until we add this patch)


> > > +     if (macsec->offload == offload)
> > > +             return 0;
> > > +
> > > +     /* Check if the offloading mode is supported by the underlying layers */
> > > +     if (offload != MACSEC_OFFLOAD_OFF &&
> > > +         !macsec_check_offload(offload, macsec))
> > > +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +
> > > +     /* Check if the net device is busy. */
> > > +     if (netif_running(dev))
> > > +             return -EBUSY;
> > > +
> > > +     return macsec_update_offload(macsec, offload); }
> > > +
> > 
> > --
> > Sabrina
> 

-- 
Sabrina


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-07 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-07 10:10 [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macsec: add support for IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD in macsec_changelink ehakim
2022-12-07 10:10 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] macsec: dump IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD attribute as part of macsec dump ehakim
2022-12-07 15:33   ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-07 15:35 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macsec: add support for IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD in macsec_changelink Jiri Pirko
2022-12-07 15:45 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2022-12-07 15:52   ` Emeel Hakim
2022-12-07 22:03     ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2022-12-08  6:53       ` Emeel Hakim
2022-12-08 10:37         ` Sabrina Dubroca
2022-12-08 11:14           ` Emeel Hakim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5ENwSv4Q+A4O6lG@hog \
    --to=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ehakim@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=raeds@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).