From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Cc: andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
michael.chan@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, selvin.xavier@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Add Auxiliary driver support
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5G8Qzly9F3fP0Em@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20221207175310.23656-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 09:53:03AM -0800, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> Add auxiliary device driver for Broadcom devices.
> The bnxt_en driver will register and initialize an aux device
> if RDMA is enabled in the underlying device.
> The bnxt_re driver will then probe and initialize the
> RoCE interfaces with the infiniband stack.
>
> We got rid of the bnxt_en_ops which the bnxt_re driver used to
> communicate with bnxt_en.
> Similarly We have tried to clean up most of the bnxt_ulp_ops.
> In most of the cases we used the functions and entry points provided
> by the auxiliary bus driver framework.
> And now these are the minimal functions needed to support the functionality.
>
> We will try to work on getting rid of the remaining if we find any
> other viable option in future.
>
> v1->v2:
> - Incorporated review comments including usage of ulp_id &
> complex function indirections.
> - Used function calls provided by the auxiliary bus interface
> instead of proprietary calls.
> - Refactor code to remove ROCE driver's access to bnxt structure.
I still see wrong usage of auxiliary driver model, especially for RDMA
device. That model mimics general driver model, where you should
separate between device creation and configuration.
I would expect that your bnxt_en create pre-configured devices with
right amount of MSI-X, limits, capabilities e.t.c and RDMA driver will
simply bind to it. It means that calls like bnxt_re_request_msix()
should go too. All PCI-related logic needs to be in netdev.
In addition, I saw IS_ERR_OR_NULL(..) and "if(dev)" checks in various
uninit functions and it can be one of two: wrong unwind flow or wrong
use of driver model. In right implementation, your driver will be called
only on valid device and uninit won't be called for not-initialized device.
Also I spotted .ulp_async_notifier, which is not used and
bnxt_re_sriov_config() is prune to races due to separation between
driver bind and device creation. You should configure SR-IOV in device
creation stage.
Thanks
>
> v2->v3:
> - Addressed review comments including cleanup of some unnecessary wrappers
> - Fixed warnings seen during cross compilation
>
> v3->v4:
> - Cleaned up bnxt_ulp.c and bnxt_ulp.h further
> - Removed some more dead code
> - Sending the patchset as a standalone series
>
> v4->v5:
> - Removed the SRIOV config callback which bnxt_en driver was calling into
> bnxt_re driver.
> - Removed excessive checks for rdev and other pointers.
>
> Please apply. Thanks.
>
> Ajit Khaparde (6):
> bnxt_en: Add auxiliary driver support
> RDMA/bnxt_re: Use auxiliary driver interface
> bnxt_en: Remove usage of ulp_id
> bnxt_en: Use direct API instead of indirection
> bnxt_en: Use auxiliary bus calls over proprietary calls
> RDMA/bnxt_re: Remove the sriov config callback
>
> Hongguang Gao (1):
> bnxt_en: Remove struct bnxt access from RoCE driver
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/bnxt_re.h | 9 +-
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/main.c | 591 +++++++-----------
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 10 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h | 8 +
> .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c | 7 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ulp.c | 413 ++++++------
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ulp.h | 53 +-
> 7 files changed, 490 insertions(+), 601 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 17:53 [PATCH v5 0/7] Add Auxiliary driver support Ajit Khaparde
2022-12-07 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] bnxt_en: Add auxiliary " Ajit Khaparde
2022-12-07 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Use auxiliary driver interface Ajit Khaparde
2022-12-07 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] bnxt_en: Remove usage of ulp_id Ajit Khaparde
2022-12-07 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] bnxt_en: Use direct API instead of indirection Ajit Khaparde
2022-12-07 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] bnxt_en: Use auxiliary bus calls over proprietary calls Ajit Khaparde
2022-12-07 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] bnxt_en: Remove struct bnxt access from RoCE driver Ajit Khaparde
2022-12-07 17:53 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] RDMA/bnxt_re: Remove the sriov config callback Ajit Khaparde
2022-12-08 10:28 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5G8Qzly9F3fP0Em@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=selvin.xavier@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).