From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<hawk@kernel.org>, <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] tsnep: Add XDP TX support
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 15:10:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5HwRZmCv2WYpBtg@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221208054045.3600-3-gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 06:40:41AM +0100, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
> Implement ndo_xdp_xmit() for XDP TX support. Support for fragmented XDP
> frames is included.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h | 12 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h
> index f72c0c4da1a9..29b04127f529 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ struct tsnep_rxnfc_rule {
> int location;
> };
>
> +enum tsnep_tx_type {
> + TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB,
> + TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_TX,
> + TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_NDO,
> +};
> +
> struct tsnep_tx_entry {
> struct tsnep_tx_desc *desc;
> struct tsnep_tx_desc_wb *desc_wb;
> @@ -65,7 +71,11 @@ struct tsnep_tx_entry {
>
> u32 properties;
>
> - struct sk_buff *skb;
> + enum tsnep_tx_type type;
> + union {
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
> + };
> size_t len;
> DEFINE_DMA_UNMAP_ADDR(dma);
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c
> index a28fde9fb060..b97cfd5fa1fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c
> @@ -310,10 +310,11 @@ static void tsnep_tx_activate(struct tsnep_tx *tx, int index, int length,
> struct tsnep_tx_entry *entry = &tx->entry[index];
>
> entry->properties = 0;
> - if (entry->skb) {
> + if (entry->skb || entry->xdpf) {
i think this change is redundant, you could keep a single check as skb and
xdpf ptrs share the same memory, but i guess this makes it more obvious
> entry->properties = length & TSNEP_DESC_LENGTH_MASK;
> entry->properties |= TSNEP_DESC_INTERRUPT_FLAG;
> - if (skb_shinfo(entry->skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS)
> + if (entry->type == TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB &&
> + skb_shinfo(entry->skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS)
> entry->properties |= TSNEP_DESC_EXTENDED_WRITEBACK_FLAG;
>
> /* toggle user flag to prevent false acknowledge
> @@ -400,6 +401,8 @@ static int tsnep_tx_map(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tsnep_tx *tx, int count)
>
> entry->desc->tx = __cpu_to_le64(dma);
>
> + entry->type = TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB;
> +
> map_len += len;
> }
>
> @@ -417,12 +420,13 @@ static int tsnep_tx_unmap(struct tsnep_tx *tx, int index, int count)
> entry = &tx->entry[(index + i) % TSNEP_RING_SIZE];
>
> if (entry->len) {
> - if (i == 0)
> + if (i == 0 && entry->type == TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB)
> dma_unmap_single(dmadev,
> dma_unmap_addr(entry, dma),
> dma_unmap_len(entry, len),
> DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> - else
> + else if (entry->type == TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB ||
> + entry->type == TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_NDO)
> dma_unmap_page(dmadev,
> dma_unmap_addr(entry, dma),
> dma_unmap_len(entry, len),
> @@ -505,6 +509,122 @@ static netdev_tx_t tsnep_xmit_frame_ring(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
>
> +static int tsnep_xdp_tx_map(struct xdp_frame *xdpf, struct tsnep_tx *tx,
> + struct skb_shared_info *shinfo, int count,
> + bool dma_map)
> +{
> + struct device *dmadev = tx->adapter->dmadev;
> + skb_frag_t *frag;
> + unsigned int len;
> + struct tsnep_tx_entry *entry;
> + void *data;
> + struct page *page;
> + dma_addr_t dma;
> + int map_len = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + frag = NULL;
> + len = xdpf->len;
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + entry = &tx->entry[(tx->write + i) % TSNEP_RING_SIZE];
> + if (dma_map) {
> + data = unlikely(frag) ? skb_frag_address(frag) :
> + xdpf->data;
> + dma = dma_map_single(dmadev, data, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(dmadev, dma))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + entry->type = TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_NDO;
> + } else {
> + page = unlikely(frag) ? skb_frag_page(frag) :
> + virt_to_page(xdpf->data);
> + dma = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
> + if (unlikely(frag))
> + dma += skb_frag_off(frag);
> + else
> + dma += sizeof(*xdpf) + xdpf->headroom;
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(dmadev, dma, len,
> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> +
> + entry->type = TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_TX;
> + }
> +
> + entry->len = len;
> + dma_unmap_addr_set(entry, dma, dma);
> +
> + entry->desc->tx = __cpu_to_le64(dma);
> +
> + map_len += len;
> +
> + if ((i + 1) < count) {
> + frag = &shinfo->frags[i];
> + len = skb_frag_size(frag);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return map_len;
> +}
> +
> +/* This function requires __netif_tx_lock is held by the caller. */
> +static int tsnep_xdp_xmit_frame_ring(struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
> + struct tsnep_tx *tx, bool dma_map)
> +{
> + struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame(xdpf);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int count = 1;
> + struct tsnep_tx_entry *entry;
> + int length;
> + int i;
> + int retval;
> +
> + if (unlikely(xdp_frame_has_frags(xdpf)))
> + count += shinfo->nr_frags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tx->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (tsnep_tx_desc_available(tx) < (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 + count)) {
Wouldn't count + 1 be sufficient to check against the descs available?
if there are frags then you have already accounted them under count
variable so i feel like MAX_SKB_FRAGS is redundant.
> + /* prevent full TX ring due to XDP */
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags);
> +
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + entry = &tx->entry[tx->write];
> + entry->xdpf = xdpf;
> +
> + retval = tsnep_xdp_tx_map(xdpf, tx, shinfo, count, dma_map);
> + if (retval < 0) {
> + tsnep_tx_unmap(tx, tx->write, count);
> + entry->xdpf = NULL;
> +
> + tx->dropped++;
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags);
> +
> + netdev_err(tx->adapter->netdev, "XDP TX DMA map failed\n");
> +
> + return retval;
> + }
> + length = retval;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> + tsnep_tx_activate(tx, (tx->write + i) % TSNEP_RING_SIZE, length,
> + i == (count - 1));
> + tx->write = (tx->write + count) % TSNEP_RING_SIZE;
> +
> + /* descriptor properties shall be valid before hardware is notified */
> + dma_wmb();
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
(...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-08 5:40 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] tsnep: XDP support Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] tsnep: Add adapter down state Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] tsnep: Add XDP TX support Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 14:10 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2022-12-08 19:57 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-09 2:23 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-12-09 8:02 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] tsnep: Support XDP BPF program setup Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-09 0:43 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-12-09 8:06 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-21 20:19 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] tsnep: Prepare RX buffer for XDP support Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-09 0:46 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] tsnep: Add RX queue info " Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 12:59 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-12-08 20:32 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-09 0:53 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-12-09 8:11 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] tsnep: Add XDP RX support Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 13:40 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-12-08 22:12 ` Gerhard Engleder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5HwRZmCv2WYpBtg@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gerhard@engleder-embedded.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).