Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: phylink: add a function to resume phy alone to fix resume issue with WoL enabled

["Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 04:01:43PM +0800, Clark Wang wrote:
> Issue we met:
> On some platforms, mac cannot work after resumed from the suspend with WoL
> enabled.
> 
> The cause of the issue:
> 1. phylink_resolve() is in a workqueue which will not be executed immediately.
>    This is the call sequence:
>        phylink_resolve()->phylink_link_up()->pl->mac_ops->mac_link_up()
>    For stmmac driver, mac_link_up() will set the correct speed/duplex...
>    values which are from link_state.
> 2. In stmmac_resume(), it will call stmmac_hw_setup() after called the
>    phylink_resume(), because mac need phy rx_clk to do the reset.
>    stmmac_core_init() is called in function stmmac_hw_setup(), which will
>    reset the mac and set the speed/duplex... to default value.
> Conclusion: Because phylink_resolve() cannot determine when it is called, it
>             cannot be guaranteed to be called after stmmac_core_init().
> 	    Once stmmac_core_init() is called after phylink_resolve(),
> 	    the mac will be misconfigured and cannot be used.
> 
> In order to avoid this problem, add a function called phylink_phy_resume()
> to resume phy separately. This eliminates the need to call phylink_resume()
> before stmmac_hw_setup().
> 
> Add another judgement before called phy_start() in phylink_start(). This way
> phy_start() will not be called multiple times when resumes. At the same time,
> it may not affect other drivers that do not use phylink_phy_resume().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/phylink.h   |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> index 09cc65c0da93..5bab59142579 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> @@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ void phylink_start(struct phylink *pl)
>  	}
>  	if (poll)
>  		mod_timer(&pl->link_poll, jiffies + HZ);
> -	if (pl->phydev)
> +	if (pl->phydev && pl->phydev->state < PHY_UP)

I'm really not happy with this - not only does this subvert the checks in
phy_start(), it's a layering violation, and it delves into internals of
phylib in an unprotected way.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!