netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] 9p/rdma: unmap receive dma buffer in rdma_request()/post_recv()
@ 2023-01-04  2:04 Zhengchao Shao
  2023-01-04  7:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhengchao Shao @ 2023-01-04  2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: v9fs-developer, netdev, ericvh, lucho, asmadeus, davem, edumazet,
	kuba, pabeni
  Cc: linux_oss, tom, weiyongjun1, yuehaibing, shaozhengchao

When down_interruptible() or ib_post_send() failed in rdma_request(),
receive dma buffer is not unmapped. Add unmap action to error path.
Also if ib_post_recv() failed in post_recv(), dma buffer is not unmapped.
Add unmap action to error path.

Fixes: fc79d4b104f0 ("9p: rdma: RDMA Transport Support for 9P")
Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
---
v2: add unmap action if ib_post_send() or ib_post_recv() failed
---
 net/9p/trans_rdma.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/9p/trans_rdma.c b/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
index 83f9100d46bf..b84748baf9cb 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ post_recv(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_rdma_context *c)
 	struct p9_trans_rdma *rdma = client->trans;
 	struct ib_recv_wr wr;
 	struct ib_sge sge;
+	int ret;
 
 	c->busa = ib_dma_map_single(rdma->cm_id->device,
 				    c->rc.sdata, client->msize,
@@ -402,7 +403,12 @@ post_recv(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_rdma_context *c)
 	wr.wr_cqe = &c->cqe;
 	wr.sg_list = &sge;
 	wr.num_sge = 1;
-	return ib_post_recv(rdma->qp, &wr, NULL);
+
+	ret = ib_post_recv(rdma->qp, &wr, NULL);
+	if (ret)
+		ib_dma_unmap_single(rdma->cm_id->device, c->busa,
+				    client->msize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+	return ret;
 
  error:
 	p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "EIO\n");
@@ -499,7 +505,7 @@ static int rdma_request(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
 
 	if (down_interruptible(&rdma->sq_sem)) {
 		err = -EINTR;
-		goto send_error;
+		goto dma_unmap;
 	}
 
 	/* Mark request as `sent' *before* we actually send it,
@@ -509,11 +515,14 @@ static int rdma_request(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
 	WRITE_ONCE(req->status, REQ_STATUS_SENT);
 	err = ib_post_send(rdma->qp, &wr, NULL);
 	if (err)
-		goto send_error;
+		goto dma_unmap;
 
 	/* Success */
 	return 0;
 
+dma_unmap:
+	ib_dma_unmap_single(rdma->cm_id->device, c->busa,
+			    c->req->tc.size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
  /* Handle errors that happened during or while preparing the send: */
  send_error:
 	WRITE_ONCE(req->status, REQ_STATUS_ERROR);
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] 9p/rdma: unmap receive dma buffer in rdma_request()/post_recv()
  2023-01-04  2:04 [PATCH v2] 9p/rdma: unmap receive dma buffer in rdma_request()/post_recv() Zhengchao Shao
@ 2023-01-04  7:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
  2023-02-11  0:22   ` asmadeus
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2023-01-04  7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhengchao Shao
  Cc: v9fs-developer, netdev, ericvh, lucho, asmadeus, davem, edumazet,
	kuba, pabeni, linux_oss, tom, weiyongjun1, yuehaibing

On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 10:04:24AM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
> When down_interruptible() or ib_post_send() failed in rdma_request(),
> receive dma buffer is not unmapped. Add unmap action to error path.
> Also if ib_post_recv() failed in post_recv(), dma buffer is not unmapped.
> Add unmap action to error path.
> 
> Fixes: fc79d4b104f0 ("9p: rdma: RDMA Transport Support for 9P")
> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2: add unmap action if ib_post_send() or ib_post_recv() failed
> ---
>  net/9p/trans_rdma.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] 9p/rdma: unmap receive dma buffer in rdma_request()/post_recv()
  2023-01-04  7:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
@ 2023-02-11  0:22   ` asmadeus
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: asmadeus @ 2023-02-11  0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhengchao Shao
  Cc: Leon Romanovsky, v9fs-developer, netdev, ericvh, lucho, davem,
	edumazet, kuba, pabeni, linux_oss, tom, weiyongjun1, yuehaibing

Leon Romanovsky wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 09:39:07AM +0200:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 10:04:24AM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
> > When down_interruptible() or ib_post_send() failed in rdma_request(),
> > receive dma buffer is not unmapped. Add unmap action to error path.
> > Also if ib_post_recv() failed in post_recv(), dma buffer is not unmapped.
> > Add unmap action to error path.
> >
> > Fixes: fc79d4b104f0 ("9p: rdma: RDMA Transport Support for 9P")
> > Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

Sorry for the delay -- I have no way of testing it but it looks sane,
I'll submit it when 6.3 opens up in a week or two.

Thanks for the patch & Leon for the review.

-- 
Dominique

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-11  0:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-04  2:04 [PATCH v2] 9p/rdma: unmap receive dma buffer in rdma_request()/post_recv() Zhengchao Shao
2023-01-04  7:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-02-11  0:22   ` asmadeus

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).