From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F98C54EBD
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  6 Jan 2023 06:41:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S230477AbjAFGlt (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 6 Jan 2023 01:41:49 -0500
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39604 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S229532AbjAFGlq (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 6 Jan 2023 01:41:46 -0500
Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46B2A641F;
        Thu,  5 Jan 2023 22:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05AC2B81C6C;
        Fri,  6 Jan 2023 06:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33132C433D2;
        Fri,  6 Jan 2023 06:41:41 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=k20201202; t=1672987302;
        bh=lzkrT0JCwviE3EGm/EmzPw8/d4eWbQj9WlhSQzvPbpo=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
        b=fMAUAd4xS17Y33wWPFyPkBxdkNSMW3jGVvt1lPqi5Fu3uSsxR3yMMoTKlthLHm0YB
         UoKTC4SEGIg/7bSG/y7CsAY2DVpYZ9IdGgqo7nvoXEe/p60K/84vn2WlAs/CN5JT07
         1Z35wQp6gyXxgwIuuiyLQYkO5/yzv5IPP4luScSXzb4itzdpxaUPuwq8KQxFNcYYUI
         wutSMdypIAEWMpe2MrXoKpKFN1MzhJRMbthJcgm0nK35jHuRkywTh3+bfdImXvefa8
         Qypyi30s4gdb/CfHUb44s1bas/VQVT/8lXc4zWpiX2UD646moEtrke+wJ0ec6uTsMt
         OM9VmIj27/VWQ==
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2023 08:41:38 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/8] mlx5 IPsec RoCEv2 support and netdev
 events fixes in RDMA
Message-ID: <Y7fCouYoyEVCLUdP@unreal>
References: <20230105041756.677120-1-saeed@kernel.org>
 <Y7bLMiB9Pb8EUfn0@unreal>
 <20230105103746.13c791d8@kernel.org>
 <Y7cvLGQwaWKrFixC@unreal>
 <20230105122517.235208c3@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230105122517.235208c3@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:25:17PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 22:12:28 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > PR should be based on Linus's -rcX tag and shouldn't include only this patchset.  
> > > 
> > > FWIW I don't understand what you mean by this comment.
> > > PR should be based on a common ancestor, the -rc tags 
> > > are just a convenient shorthand.  
> > 
> > Linus asked for more than once to use sensible ancestor which is -rc.
> 
> I mean.. as I said using -rc tags makes sanity checking the PRs easier,
> so definitely encouraged.
> 
> I was asking more about the second part of your sentence, what do you
> mean by "shouldn't include only this patchset" ?

When I saw "be applied to net-mlx5 branch", I imagined some branch which
is based on net-rc and not on mlx5-next as usual. It looks like Saeed's
intention was to say mlx5-next, but he misspelled it.

Thanks