netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] devlink: always check if the devlink instance is registered
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 13:41:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7gXEk3XEXGEpooC@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230106063402.485336-5-kuba@kernel.org>

Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 07:33:57AM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>Always check under the instance lock whether the devlink instance
>is still / already registered.
>
>This is a no-op for the most part, as the unregistration path currently
>waits for all references. On the init path, however, we may temporarily
>open up a race with netdev code, if netdevs are registered before the
>devlink instance. This is temporary, the next change fixes it, and this
>commit has been split out for the ease of review.
>
>Note that in case of iterating over sub-objects which have their
>own lock (regions and line cards) we assume an implicit dependency
>between those objects existing and devlink unregistration.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
>---
> net/devlink/core.c          | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> net/devlink/devl_internal.h |  8 ++++++++
> net/devlink/leftover.c      | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> net/devlink/netlink.c       | 10 ++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/devlink/core.c b/net/devlink/core.c
>index d3b8336946fd..c53c996edf1d 100644
>--- a/net/devlink/core.c
>+++ b/net/devlink/core.c
>@@ -67,6 +67,15 @@ void devl_unlock(struct devlink *devlink)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_unlock);
> 
>+/**
>+ * devlink_try_get() - try to obtain a reference on a devlink instance
>+ * @devlink: instance to reference
>+ *
>+ * Obtain a reference on a devlink instance. A reference on a devlink instance
>+ * only implies that it's safe to take the instance lock. It does not imply
>+ * that the instance is registered, use devl_is_registered() after taking
>+ * the instance lock to check registration status.
>+ */
> struct devlink *__must_check devlink_try_get(struct devlink *devlink)
> {
> 	if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&devlink->refcount))
>@@ -300,10 +309,12 @@ static void __net_exit devlink_pernet_pre_exit(struct net *net)
> 	devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(net, index, devlink) {
> 		WARN_ON(!(devlink->features & DEVLINK_F_RELOAD));
> 		devl_lock(devlink);
>-		err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net,
>-				     DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT,
>-				     DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_UNSPEC,
>-				     &actions_performed, NULL);
>+		err = 0;
>+		if (devl_is_registered(devlink))
>+			err = devlink_reload(devlink, &init_net,
>+					     DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT,
>+					     DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_UNSPEC,
>+					     &actions_performed, NULL);
> 		devl_unlock(devlink);
> 		devlink_put(devlink);
> 
>diff --git a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
>index 6342552e5f99..01a00df81d0e 100644
>--- a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
>+++ b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
>@@ -86,6 +86,14 @@ extern struct genl_family devlink_nl_family;
> 
> struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp);
> 
>+static inline bool devl_is_registered(struct devlink *devlink)
>+{
>+	/* To prevent races the caller must hold the instance lock
>+	 * or another lock taken during unregistration.
>+	 */
>+	return xa_get_mark(&devlinks, devlink->index, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
>+}
>+
> /* Netlink */
> #define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_PORT		BIT(0)
> #define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_DEVLINK_OR_PORT	BIT(1)
>diff --git a/net/devlink/leftover.c b/net/devlink/leftover.c
>index bec408da4dbe..491f821c8b77 100644
>--- a/net/devlink/leftover.c
>+++ b/net/devlink/leftover.c
>@@ -2130,6 +2130,9 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_linecard_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> 		int idx = 0;
> 
> 		mutex_lock(&devlink->linecards_lock);
>+		if (!devl_is_registered(devlink))
>+			goto next_devlink;
>+
> 		list_for_each_entry(linecard, &devlink->linecard_list, list) {
> 			if (idx < state->idx) {
> 				idx++;
>@@ -2151,6 +2154,7 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_linecard_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> 			}
> 			idx++;
> 		}
>+next_devlink:
> 		mutex_unlock(&devlink->linecards_lock);
> 		devlink_put(devlink);
> 	}
>@@ -7809,6 +7813,12 @@ devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> 		int idx = 0;
> 
> 		mutex_lock(&devlink->reporters_lock);
>+		if (!devl_is_registered(devlink)) {

Good. I have patchset to remove this and linecard lock prepared. That
makes things smoother.

Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>



>+			mutex_unlock(&devlink->reporters_lock);
>+			devlink_put(devlink);
>+			continue;
>+		}
>+
> 		list_for_each_entry(reporter, &devlink->reporter_list,
> 				    list) {
> 			if (idx < state->idx) {
>@@ -7830,6 +7840,9 @@ devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> 		mutex_unlock(&devlink->reporters_lock);
> 
> 		devl_lock(devlink);
>+		if (!devl_is_registered(devlink))
>+			goto next_devlink;
>+
> 		xa_for_each(&devlink->ports, port_index, port) {
> 			mutex_lock(&port->reporters_lock);
> 			list_for_each_entry(reporter, &port->reporter_list, list) {
>@@ -7853,6 +7866,7 @@ devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *msg,
> 			}
> 			mutex_unlock(&port->reporters_lock);
> 		}
>+next_devlink:
> 		devl_unlock(devlink);
> 		devlink_put(devlink);
> 	}
>@@ -12218,7 +12232,8 @@ void devlink_compat_running_version(struct devlink *devlink,
> 		return;
> 
> 	devl_lock(devlink);
>-	__devlink_compat_running_version(devlink, buf, len);
>+	if (devl_is_registered(devlink))
>+		__devlink_compat_running_version(devlink, buf, len);
> 	devl_unlock(devlink);
> }
> 
>@@ -12227,20 +12242,28 @@ int devlink_compat_flash_update(struct devlink *devlink, const char *file_name)
> 	struct devlink_flash_update_params params = {};
> 	int ret;
> 
>-	if (!devlink->ops->flash_update)
>-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+	devl_lock(devlink);
>+	if (!devl_is_registered(devlink)) {
>+		ret = -ENODEV;
>+		goto out_unlock;
>+	}
>+
>+	if (!devlink->ops->flash_update) {
>+		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+		goto out_unlock;
>+	}
> 
> 	ret = request_firmware(&params.fw, file_name, devlink->dev);
> 	if (ret)
>-		return ret;
>+		goto out_unlock;
> 
>-	devl_lock(devlink);
> 	devlink_flash_update_begin_notify(devlink);
> 	ret = devlink->ops->flash_update(devlink, &params, NULL);
> 	devlink_flash_update_end_notify(devlink);
>-	devl_unlock(devlink);
> 
> 	release_firmware(params.fw);
>+out_unlock:
>+	devl_unlock(devlink);
> 
> 	return ret;
> }
>diff --git a/net/devlink/netlink.c b/net/devlink/netlink.c
>index 69111746f5d9..b5b8ac6db2d1 100644
>--- a/net/devlink/netlink.c
>+++ b/net/devlink/netlink.c
>@@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ devlink_get_from_attrs_lock(struct net *net, struct nlattr **attrs)
> 
> 	devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(net, index, devlink) {
> 		devl_lock(devlink);
>-		if (strcmp(devlink->dev->bus->name, busname) == 0 &&
>+		if (devl_is_registered(devlink) &&
>+		    strcmp(devlink->dev->bus->name, busname) == 0 &&
> 		    strcmp(dev_name(devlink->dev), devname) == 0)
> 			return devlink;
> 		devl_unlock(devlink);
>@@ -211,7 +212,12 @@ int devlink_nl_instance_iter_dump(struct sk_buff *msg,
> 
> 	devlink_dump_for_each_instance_get(msg, state, devlink) {
> 		devl_lock(devlink);
>-		err = cmd->dump_one(msg, devlink, cb);
>+
>+		if (devl_is_registered(devlink))
>+			err = cmd->dump_one(msg, devlink, cb);
>+		else
>+			err = 0;
>+
> 		devl_unlock(devlink);
> 		devlink_put(devlink);
> 
>-- 
>2.38.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-06 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-06  6:33 [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:17   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] devlink: update the code in netns move to latest helpers Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] devlink: protect devlink->dev by the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:18   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] devlink: always check if the devlink instance is registered Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:41   ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-01-06 17:03   ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 21:19     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07  9:05       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] devlink: remove the registration guarantee of references Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:42   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] devlink: don't require setting features before registration Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:43   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] devlink: allow registering parameters after the instance Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:55   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:22     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07  9:20       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10  0:21       ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-10 16:35         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 20:22           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11  9:32             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 16:45               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 21:29                 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-12  7:07                   ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 14:59                     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 19:58                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13  7:50                         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-15  8:35                           ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-16 10:33                             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-16 11:25                               ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 19:20                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-12 20:09                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 22:44                         ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-13  6:45                           ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13  7:53                             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 13:21   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] netdevsim: rename a label Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:56   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] netdevsim: move devlink registration under the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 15:49   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-06 15:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:06 ` Jacob Keller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7gXEk3XEXGEpooC@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).