From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE0DC63797 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 19:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235566AbjAFTfQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2023 14:35:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33116 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235727AbjAFTer (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2023 14:34:47 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E904268C8C; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 11:34:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C1BB81C39; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 19:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C14F0C433EF; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 19:34:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1673033682; bh=V8R6GREMQHFTWGmJjJVX3DCS6UY+0a4/L4eOTj/MoV4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q7WIvUiWeo9hEFfLSjG57GWkRqPOHpwl/q7ler+xdqJ426+nf6AE12UPM2FgaTeox 2SgRIqQsbrQN0GOSNcQ0+B/lfrW/ur8FAWphYkhqEouFFx+V8HwZ8V71uVKkgdWPSO 1EHEytSQNCwYjFKaHYloRyyqC26Z9/V6bnx4tncnHgGjAkcnTQE6SggGKNsnRoOsUI Zcgq4V6idtfEZqgqX+Bb2pRiYrQeqqGCTjR1QTaFnikOiKZntPZvcajN5eAhme5fJw FFCHvi/+EqmxgNUG1aFNQdMNZ+Wt6iGsCwdbNZox03R1G7meveU9uWNvEZrVkTMqjZ XZ9TJjgOXSZ9Q== Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 11:34:41 -0800 From: Saeed Mahameed To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Saeed Mahameed , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/8] mlx5 IPsec RoCEv2 support and netdev events fixes in RDMA Message-ID: References: <20230105041756.677120-1-saeed@kernel.org> <20230105103746.13c791d8@kernel.org> <20230105122517.235208c3@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 06 Jan 08:41, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:25:17PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 22:12:28 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote: >> > > > PR should be based on Linus's -rcX tag and shouldn't include only this patchset. >> > > >> > > FWIW I don't understand what you mean by this comment. >> > > PR should be based on a common ancestor, the -rc tags >> > > are just a convenient shorthand. >> > >> > Linus asked for more than once to use sensible ancestor which is -rc. >> >> I mean.. as I said using -rc tags makes sanity checking the PRs easier, >> so definitely encouraged. >> >> I was asking more about the second part of your sentence, what do you >> mean by "shouldn't include only this patchset" ? > >When I saw "be applied to net-mlx5 branch", I imagined some branch which >is based on net-rc and not on mlx5-next as usual. It looks like Saeed's >intention was to say mlx5-next, but he misspelled it. I meant mlx5-next.