From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: "Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)" <sforshee@digitalocean.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)" <sforshee@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost: check for pending livepatches from vhost worker kthreads
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:17:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8/ohzRGcOiqsh69@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120-vhost-klp-switching-v1-2-7c2b65519c43@kernel.org>
On Fri 2023-01-20 16:12:22, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote:
> Livepatch relies on stack checking of sleeping tasks to switch kthreads,
> so a busy kthread can block a livepatch transition indefinitely. We've
> seen this happen fairly often with busy vhost kthreads.
To be precise, it would be "indefinitely" only when the kthread never
sleeps.
But yes. I believe that the problem is real. It might be almost
impossible to livepatch some busy kthreads, especially when they
have a dedicated CPU.
> Add a check to call klp_switch_current() from vhost_worker() when a
> livepatch is pending. In testing this allowed vhost kthreads to switch
> immediately when they had previously blocked livepatch transitions for
> long periods of time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) <sforshee@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index cbe72bfd2f1f..d8624f1f2d64 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -366,6 +367,9 @@ static int vhost_worker(void *data)
> if (need_resched())
> schedule();
> }
> +
> + if (unlikely(klp_patch_pending(current)))
> + klp_switch_current();
I suggest to use the following intead:
if (unlikely(klp_patch_pending(current)))
klp_update_patch_state(current);
We already use this in do_idle(). The reason is basically the same.
It is almost impossible to livepatch the idle task when a CPU is
very idle.
klp_update_patch_state(current) does not check the stack.
It switches the task immediately.
It should be safe because the kthread never leaves vhost_worker().
It means that the same kthread could never re-enter this function
and use the new code.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-20 22:12 [PATCH 0/2] vhost: improve livepatch switching for heavily loaded vhost worker kthreads Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)
2023-01-20 22:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] livepatch: add an interface for safely switching kthreads Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)
2023-01-20 22:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] vhost: check for pending livepatches from vhost worker kthreads Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)
2023-01-24 14:17 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2023-01-24 17:21 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-25 11:34 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-25 16:57 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-26 11:16 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-26 11:49 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] vhost: improve livepatch switching for heavily loaded " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-26 17:03 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-26 21:12 ` Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)
2023-01-27 4:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-27 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-27 12:09 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-27 14:37 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-27 16:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-27 17:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-27 22:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-30 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-30 17:50 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-30 18:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-30 18:36 ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-30 19:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-31 1:53 ` Song Liu
2023-01-31 10:22 ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-31 16:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-01 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2023-02-01 16:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-01 17:11 ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-30 19:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-31 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-27 20:02 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-27 11:19 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-27 14:57 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-30 9:55 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8/ohzRGcOiqsh69@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sforshee@digitalocean.com \
--cc=sforshee@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox