netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, bcodding@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] vhost-scsi: unbreak any layout for response
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:11:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y88GEm63Tsg1AAu4@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230119073647.76467-1-jasowang@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2730 bytes --]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:36:47PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Al Viro said:
> 
> """
> Since "vhost/scsi: fix reuse of &vq->iov[out] in response"
> we have this:
>                 cmd->tvc_resp_iov = vq->iov[vc.out];
>                 cmd->tvc_in_iovs = vc.in;
> combined with
>                 iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, ITER_DEST, &cmd->tvc_resp_iov,
>                               cmd->tvc_in_iovs, sizeof(v_rsp));
> in vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work().  We used to have ->tvc_resp_iov
> _pointing_ to vq->iov[vc.out]; back then iov_iter_init() asked to
> set an iovec-backed iov_iter over the tail of vq->iov[], with
> length being the amount of iovecs in the tail.
> 
> Now we have a copy of one element of that array.  Fortunately, the members
> following it in the containing structure are two non-NULL kernel pointers,
> so copy_to_iter() will not copy anything beyond the first iovec - kernel
> pointer is not (on the majority of architectures) going to be accepted by
> access_ok() in copyout() and it won't be skipped since the "length" (in
> reality - another non-NULL kernel pointer) won't be zero.
> 
> So it's not going to give a guest-to-qemu escalation, but it's definitely
> a bug.  Frankly, my preference would be to verify that the very first iovec
> is long enough to hold rsp_size.  Due to the above, any users that try to
> give us vq->iov[vc.out].iov_len < sizeof(struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp)
> would currently get a failure in vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work()
> anyway.
> """
> 
> However, the spec doesn't say anything about the legacy descriptor
> layout for the respone. So this patch tries to not assume the response
> to reside in a single separate descriptor which is what commit
> 79c14141a487 ("vhost/scsi: Convert completion path to use") tries to
> achieve towards to ANY_LAYOUT.
> 
> This is done by allocating and using dedicate resp iov in the
> command. To be safety, start with UIO_MAXIOV to be consistent with the
> limitation that we advertise to the vhost_get_vq_desc().
> 
> Testing with the hacked virtio-scsi driver that use 1 descriptor for 1
> byte in the response.
> 
> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> Fixes: a77ec83a5789 ("vhost/scsi: fix reuse of &vq->iov[out] in response")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes since V1:
> - tweak the changelog
> - fix the allocation size for tvc_resp_iov (should be sizeof(struct iovec))
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2023-01-23 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-19  7:36 [PATCH V2] vhost-scsi: unbreak any layout for response Jason Wang
2023-01-23 22:11 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y88GEm63Tsg1AAu4@fedora \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).