From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@chelsio.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@corigine.com, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Raju Rangoju <rajur@chelsio.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 01/10] xfrm: extend add policy callback to set failure reason
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 09:28:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9Irgrgf3uxOjwUm@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230125110226.66dc7eeb@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:02:26AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 13:54:57 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > - err = dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_policy_add(xp);
> > + err = dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_policy_add(xp, extack);
> > if (err) {
> > xdo->dev = NULL;
> > xdo->real_dev = NULL;
> > xdo->type = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_UNSPECIFIED;
> > xdo->dir = 0;
> > netdev_put(dev, &xdo->dev_tracker);
> > - NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device failed to offload this policy");
>
> In a handful of places we do:
>
> if (!extack->msg)
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device failed to offload this policy");
>
> in case the device did not provide the extack.
> Dunno if it's worth doing here.
Honestly, I followed devlink.c which didn't do that, but looked again
and found that devlink can potentially overwrite messages :)
For example in this case:
997 err = ops->port_fn_state_get(port, &state, &opstate, extack);
998 if (err) {
999 if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
1000 return 0;
1001 return err;
1002 }
1003 if (!devlink_port_fn_state_valid(state)) {
1004 WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
1005 NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid state read from driver");
1006 return -EINVAL;
1007 }
So what do you think about the following change, so we can leave
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD() in devlink and xfrm intact?
diff --git a/include/linux/netlink.h b/include/linux/netlink.h
index 38f6334f408c..d6f3a958e30b 100644
--- a/include/linux/netlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/netlink.h
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct netlink_ext_ack {
\
do_trace_netlink_extack(__msg); \
\
- if (__extack) \
+ if (__extack && !__extack->msg) \
__extack->_msg = __msg; \
} while (0)
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct netlink_ext_ack {
#define NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, fmt, args...) do { \
struct netlink_ext_ack *__extack = (extack); \
\
- if (!__extack) \
+ if (!__extack || __extack->msg) \
break; \
if (snprintf(__extack->_msg_buf, NETLINK_MAX_FMTMSG_LEN, \
"%s" fmt "%s", "", ##args, "") >= \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-26 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-24 11:54 [PATCH net-next v1 00/10] Convert drivers to return XFRM configuration errors through extack Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:54 ` [PATCH net-next v1 01/10] xfrm: extend add policy callback to set failure reason Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-25 19:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-26 7:28 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2023-01-26 9:45 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-01-26 10:42 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-26 19:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:54 ` [PATCH net-next v1 02/10] net/mlx5e: Fill IPsec policy validation " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:54 ` [PATCH net-next v1 03/10] xfrm: extend add state callback to set " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:55 ` [PATCH net-next v1 04/10] net/mlx5e: Fill IPsec state validation " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:55 ` [PATCH net-next v1 05/10] netdevsim: " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:55 ` [PATCH net-next v1 06/10] nfp: fill " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:55 ` [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] ixgbevf: " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:55 ` [PATCH net-next v1 08/10] ixgbe: " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:55 ` [PATCH net-next v1 09/10] bonding: " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-24 11:55 ` [PATCH net-next v1 10/10] cxgb4: " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-25 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next v1 00/10] Convert drivers to return XFRM configuration errors through extack Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-26 9:43 ` Steffen Klassert
2023-01-27 0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9Irgrgf3uxOjwUm@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ayush.sawal@chelsio.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rajur@chelsio.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).