From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: John Hickey <jjh@daedalian.us>
Cc: <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Shujin Li <lishujin@kuaishou.com>,
Jason Xing <xingwanli@kuaishou.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ixgbe: Panic during XDP_TX with > 64 CPUs
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:50:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9q0YDLVO+ndlaa8@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230131073815.181341-1-jjh@daedalian.us>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:38:15PM -0800, John Hickey wrote:
> In commit 'ixgbe: let the xdpdrv work with more than 64 cpus'
> (4fe815850bdc), support was added to allow XDP programs to run on systems
> with more than 64 CPUs by locking the XDP TX rings and indexing them
> using cpu % 64 (IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS).
>
> Upon trying this out patch via the Intel 5.18.6 out of tree driver
> on a system with more than 64 cores, the kernel paniced with an
> array-index-out-of-bounds at the return in ixgbe_determine_xdp_ring in
> ixgbe.h, which means ixgbe_determine_xdp_q_idx was just returning the
> cpu instead of cpu % IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS.
I'd like to ask you to include the splat you got in the commit message.
>
> I think this is how it happens:
>
> Upon loading the first XDP program on a system with more than 64 CPUs,
> ixgbe_xdp_locking_key is incremented in ixgbe_xdp_setup. However,
> immediately after this, the rings are reconfigured by ixgbe_setup_tc.
> ixgbe_setup_tc calls ixgbe_clear_interrupt_scheme which calls
> ixgbe_free_q_vectors which calls ixgbe_free_q_vector in a loop.
> ixgbe_free_q_vector decrements ixgbe_xdp_locking_key once per call if
> it is non-zero. Commenting out the decrement in ixgbe_free_q_vector
> stopped my system from panicing.
>
> I suspect to make the original patch work, I would need to load an XDP
> program and then replace it in order to get ixgbe_xdp_locking_key back
> above 0 since ixgbe_setup_tc is only called when transitioning between
> XDP and non-XDP ring configurations, while ixgbe_xdp_locking_key is
> incremented every time ixgbe_xdp_setup is called.
>
> Also, ixgbe_setup_tc can be called via ethtool --set-channels, so this
> becomes another path to decrement ixgbe_xdp_locking_key to 0 on systems
> with greater than 64 CPUs.
>
> For this patch, I have changed static_branch_inc to static_branch_enable
> in ixgbe_setup_xdp. We aren't counting references and I don't see any
> reason to turn it off, since all the locking appears to be in the XDP_TX
> path, which isn't run if a XDP program isn't loaded.
>
> Fixes: 4fe815850bdc ("ixgbe: let the xdpdrv work with more than 64 cpus")
> Signed-off-by: John Hickey <jjh@daedalian.us>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> Added Fixes and net tag. No code changes.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c | 3 ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c
> index f8156fe4b1dc..0ee943db3dc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_lib.c
> @@ -1035,9 +1035,6 @@ static void ixgbe_free_q_vector(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, int v_idx)
> adapter->q_vector[v_idx] = NULL;
> __netif_napi_del(&q_vector->napi);
>
> - if (static_key_enabled(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key))
> - static_branch_dec(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key);
Yeah calling this per each qvector is *very* unbalanced approach whereas
you bump it single time when loading xdp prog.
> -
> /*
> * after a call to __netif_napi_del() napi may still be used and
> * ixgbe_get_stats64() might access the rings on this vector,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index ab8370c413f3..cd2fb72c67be 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -10283,7 +10283,7 @@ static int ixgbe_xdp_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> if (nr_cpu_ids > IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS * 2)
> return -ENOMEM;
> else if (nr_cpu_ids > IXGBE_MAX_XDP_QS)
> - static_branch_inc(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key);
> + static_branch_enable(&ixgbe_xdp_locking_key);
Now that you removed static_branch_dec you probably need a counter part
(static_branch_disable) at appriopriate place.
>
> old_prog = xchg(&adapter->xdp_prog, prog);
> need_reset = (!!prog != !!old_prog);
> --
> 2.37.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-01 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-31 7:38 [PATCH net v2] ixgbe: Panic during XDP_TX with > 64 CPUs John Hickey
2023-02-01 18:50 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2023-02-02 1:23 ` John Hickey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9q0YDLVO+ndlaa8@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jjh@daedalian.us \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lishujin@kuaishou.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xingwanli@kuaishou.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).