From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de>
Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net: fec: do not double-parse 'phy-reset-active-high' property
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 17:08:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9sM9ZMkvjlaFPdt@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9r0EWOZbiBvkxj0@google.com>
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:21:53PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 11:54:02PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 01:53:20PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Conversion to gpiod API done in commit 468ba54bd616 ("fec: convert
> > > to gpio descriptor") clashed with gpiolib applying the same quirk to the
> > > reset GPIO polarity (introduced in commit b02c85c9458c). This results in
> > > the reset line being left active/device being left in reset state when
> > > reset line is "active low".
> > >
> > > Remove handling of 'phy-reset-active-high' property from the driver and
> > > rely on gpiolib to apply needed adjustments to avoid ending up with the
> > > double inversion/flipped logic.
> >
> > I searched the in tree DT files from 4.7 to 6.0. None use
> > phy-reset-active-high. I'm don't think it has ever had an in tree
> > user.
FTR I believe this was added in 4.6-rc1 (as 'phy-reset-active-low' in
first iteration by Bernhard Walle (CCed), so maybe he can tell us a bit
more about hardware and where it is still in service and whether this
quirk is still relevant.
> >
> > This property was marked deprecated Jul 18 2019. So i suggest we
> > completely drop it.
>
> I'd be happy kill the quirk in gpiolibi-of.c if that is what we want to
> do, although DT people sometimes are pretty touchy about keeping
> backward compatibility.
>
> I believe this should not stop us from merging this patch though, as the
> code is currently broken when this deprecated property is not present.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 21:53 [PATCH v3 1/2] net: fec: restore handling of PHY reset line as optional Dmitry Torokhov
2023-02-01 21:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net: fec: do not double-parse 'phy-reset-active-high' property Dmitry Torokhov
2023-02-01 22:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 23:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2023-02-02 1:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2023-02-02 13:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-01 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] net: fec: restore handling of PHY reset line as optional Andrew Lunn
2023-02-02 9:45 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-02-02 9:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-03 5:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9sM9ZMkvjlaFPdt@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bernhard@bwalle.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).