From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFBAC636D4 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231766AbjBBSQC (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:16:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53970 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231731AbjBBSQB (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:16:01 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 830D55356D; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:15:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D75161C83; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76F91C433D2; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:15:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1675361758; bh=G3bxvNOGrAnML7LXFiqFZvt5gM1/U0tbusvEZ2bH+4g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DhIKRMjatY7cUFvhzm215hYxGrYmtVxvvFEi36tclahYz8fizJzVgFlz5YP+GMyfc f7Q34x2cxvpcYpPq9GDDNOS3IaM9ckMhpAFosSlxz4YsBGdMefp/sjwcGulhZCexRk U1nzr1mr509B2qQdUN+0VnpOjx6xuov4jqAmCqiDxladbuahEsbhuW27CVbbNOwZhf ixVkb6K/cmpp+Zz7AGf0ABOkDFYXI2hXVFdb+lrtTPvRwNvHMtgucroH9WPTZ53K7A 9yXS+hIKRv0fSuVIyKNukQeT1VqB/o4C/yHbSTtA2Fo1cVAzPMz5t77ElwJX2x5nUF 6goerugxDbQZQ== Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:15:57 -0800 From: Saeed Mahameed To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Jason Gunthorpe , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Saeed Mahameed , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull-request: mlx5-next 2023-01-24 V2 Message-ID: References: <20230126230815.224239-1-saeed@kernel.org> <20230202091312.578aeb03@kernel.org> <20230202092507.57698495@kernel.org> <20230202095453.68f850bc@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 02 Feb 20:03, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:54:53AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:44:05 -0400 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> > > You don't remember me trying to convince you to keep the RoCE stuff >> > > away from our open source IPsec implementation? >> > >> > Huh? What does this: >> > >> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1673960981.git.leon@kernel.org/ >> > >> > Have to do with IPsec? >> >> Dunno. But I don't know what it has to do with the PR we're commenting >> on either.. > >It has to do, because I need shared branch to put net/mlx5 patches from >that "special keys" series and I patiently waited for any response. > Hi Jakub, in a nutshell, my PR adds the steering rules needed for ipsec RoCE purely in mlx5 only, ipsec tables are shared between netdev and rdma It's a reality that mlx5_core is serving both netdev and rdma, it's not about who has the keys for approving, it's that the fact the mlx5_core is not just a netdev driver, this is true for all vendors who serve both worlds it's not just mlx5.