From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A35AC433E0 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF2022CAE for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726277AbhAVBL2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:11:28 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:53506 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725775AbhAVBL0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:11:26 -0500 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l2ky8-001wpw-IJ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 02:10:32 +0100 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 02:10:32 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Oliver Neukum Cc: hayeswang@realtek.com, grundler@chromium.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] usbnet: specify naming of usbnet_set/get_link_ksettings Message-ID: References: <20210121125731.19425-1-oneukum@suse.com> <20210121125731.19425-2-oneukum@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210121125731.19425-2-oneukum@suse.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:57:29PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > The old generic functions assume that the devices includes > an MDIO interface. This is true only for genuine ethernet. > Devices with a higher level of abstraction or based on different > technologies do not have it. So in preparation for > supporting that, we rename the old functions to something specific. > > v2: adjusted to recent changes Hi Oliver It looks like my comment: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg711869.html was ignored. Do you not like the name mii? Andrew