From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-x25@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4] net: hdlc_x25: Queue outgoing LAPB frames
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:57:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YC4sB9OCl5mm3JAw@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210216201813.60394-1-xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:18:13PM -0800, Xie He wrote:
> When sending packets, we will first hand over the (L3) packets to the
> LAPB module. The LAPB module will then hand over the corresponding LAPB
> (L2) frames back to us for us to transmit.
>
> The LAPB module can also emit LAPB (L2) frames at any time, even without
> an (L3) packet currently being sent on the device. This happens when the
> LAPB module tries to send (L3) packets queued up in its internal queue,
> or when the LAPB module decides to send some (L2) control frame.
>
> This means we need to have a queue for these outgoing LAPB (L2) frames,
> otherwise frames can be dropped if sent when the hardware driver is
> already busy in transmitting. The queue needs to be controlled by
> the hardware driver's netif_stop_queue and netif_wake_queue calls.
> Therefore, we need to use the device's qdisc TX queue for this purpose.
> However, currently outgoing LAPB (L2) frames are not queued.
>
> On the other hand, outgoing (L3) packets (before they are handed over
> to the LAPB module) don't need to be queued, because the LAPB module
> already has an internal queue for them, and is able to queue new outgoing
> (L3) packets at any time. However, currently outgoing (L3) packets are
> being queued in the device's qdisc TX queue, which is controlled by
> the hardware driver's netif_stop_queue and netif_wake_queue calls.
> This is unnecessary and meaningless.
>
> To fix these issues, we can split the HDLC device into two devices -
> a virtual X.25 device and the actual HDLC device, use the virtual X.25
> device to send (L3) packets and then use the actual HDLC device to
> queue LAPB (L2) frames. The outgoing (L2) LAPB queue will be controlled
> by the hardware driver's netif_stop_queue and netif_wake_queue calls,
> while outgoing (L3) packets will not be affected by these calls.
>
> Cc: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
> Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
> ---
<...>
> +static void x25_setup_virtual_dev(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + dev->netdev_ops = &hdlc_x25_netdev_ops;
> + dev->type = ARPHRD_X25;
> + dev->addr_len = 0;
> + dev->hard_header_len = 0;
> + dev->mtu = HDLC_MAX_MTU;
> +
> + /* When transmitting data:
> + * first we'll remove a pseudo header of 1 byte,
> + * then the LAPB module will prepend an LAPB header of at most 3 bytes.
> + */
> + dev->needed_headroom = 3 - 1;
It is nice that you are resending your patch without the resolution.
However it will be awesome if you don't ignore review comments and fix this "3 - 1"
by writing solid comment above.
Thanks and good luck.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 20:18 [PATCH net-next RFC v4] net: hdlc_x25: Queue outgoing LAPB frames Xie He
2021-02-18 8:57 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-02-18 9:07 ` Xie He
2021-02-18 10:37 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-18 17:36 ` Xie He
2021-02-18 19:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-18 20:06 ` Xie He
2021-02-18 20:23 ` Xie He
2021-02-19 18:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-19 20:28 ` Xie He
2021-02-21 6:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-21 19:13 ` Xie He
2021-02-22 7:14 ` Martin Schiller
2021-02-22 8:56 ` Xie He
2021-02-26 14:20 ` Martin Schiller
2021-02-26 23:03 ` Xie He
2021-03-01 6:56 ` Martin Schiller
2021-03-01 8:56 ` Xie He
2021-03-02 7:04 ` Martin Schiller
2021-03-02 23:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-03 13:26 ` Martin Schiller
2021-03-03 20:23 ` Xie He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YC4sB9OCl5mm3JAw@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-x25@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ms@dev.tdt.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xie.he.0141@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).