From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81862C433E0 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0B064E9D for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231816AbhBLPzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:55:42 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:37230 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231422AbhBLPzc (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:55:32 -0500 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lAamK-005rA6-TH; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:54:44 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:54:44 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Bjarni Jonasson Cc: Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Antoine Tenart , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , Ioana Ciornei , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steen Hegelund Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/3] net: phy: mscc: adding LCPLL reset to VSC8514 Message-ID: References: <20210212140643.23436-1-bjarni.jonasson@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210212140643.23436-1-bjarni.jonasson@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:06:41PM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote: > At Power-On Reset, transients may cause the LCPLL to lock onto a > clock that is momentarily unstable. This is normally seen in QSGMII > setups where the higher speed 6G SerDes is being used. > This patch adds an initial LCPLL Reset to the PHY (first instance) > to avoid this issue. Hi Bjarni https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html These patches are rather large for stable, and not obviously correct. There these problems hitting real users running stable kernels? Or is it so broken it never really worked? Andrew