From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55236C433DB for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD8560202 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229596AbhBYWPO (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:15:14 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:58208 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231591AbhBYWOw (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:14:52 -0500 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lFOtW-008TR5-CR; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:14:02 +0100 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:14:02 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= Cabanelas Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, noltari@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bcm63xx_enet: fix internal phy IRQ assignment Message-ID: References: <2190629.1yaby32tsi@tool> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2190629.1yaby32tsi@tool> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 05:11:33PM +0100, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote: > The current bcm63xx_enet driver doesn't asign the internal phy IRQ. As a > result of this it works in polling mode. > > Fix it using the phy_device structure to assign the platform IRQ. Hi Daniel We still don't have a root cause analysis. I really would like to understand what is wrong here, since there should be no need to assign phydev->irq. I want to be sure we don't have the same problem with other drivers. Andrew