From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650F6C433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403B56500B for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231359AbhCJAbP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:31:15 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:48546 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230421AbhCJAal (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:30:41 -0500 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lJmkD-00A5na-OQ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:30:33 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:30:33 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Tobias Waldekranz Cc: Florian Fainelli , davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, olteanv@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC net] net: dsa: Centralize validation of VLAN configuration Message-ID: References: <20210309184244.1970173-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> <699042d3-e124-7584-6486-02a6fb45423e@gmail.com> <87h7lkow44.fsf@waldekranz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h7lkow44.fsf@waldekranz.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:28:11PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote: Hi Tobias As with Florian, i've not been following the discussion. > Yeah sorry, I can imagine that makes no sense whatsoever without the > context of the recent discussions. It is basically guarding against this > situation: > > .100 br0 .100 > \ / \ / > lan0 lan1 > > $ ip link add dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 > $ ip link add dev lan0.100 link lan0 type vlan id 100 > $ ip link add dev lan1.100 link lan1 type vlan id 100 > $ ip link set dev lan0 master br0 > $ ip link set dev lan1 master br0 # This should fail Given the complexity at hand, maybe consider putting this all into the code? Andrew