From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CD8C433E0 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0146506D for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235315AbhCPOBo (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:01:44 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:46101 "EHLO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235165AbhCPOBT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:01:19 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E095C012F; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:01:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:01:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=BwAI5R ov6PqPrUq9aKADvRJJeKYDlX+DIuU0Rux4q44=; b=dQcdvH+3pXLnHb4L88eN+K u4jdebECDnUoiKCGZEpkCmKo9Gu0AydZ+rHMpNuTQOPbWK89PuhITSN+exSn6rva MhrRqiWMoJ1KBNyNgOx17f4a76tfMUXu2xi9B03EO6XQsctKU0+YfRDtgf6yJ9gK xNSo6+h2FGEwJIJCC6HEiClG+wVi5AyEcYJG8N24Dei0h6tKcTilAIGquLIahSl2 sZ9WWCgEmSLt+ykzwkmaKkgbKEiCm2ntXMRr/Pi4R0jnFXnepLoMVwKKL/hTCuGt 3FsZpOkfSc2qY/0Ra+spEFCmzEzMJ9kMOO/kmZa/tPlMttYmfbt2EBBesloPXuJA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudefvddgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefkughoucfu tghhihhmmhgvlhcuoehiughoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpedtffekkeefudffveegueejffejhfetgfeuuefgvedtieehudeuueekhfduheel teenucfkphepkeegrddvvdelrdduheefrdeggeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehiughoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (igld-84-229-153-44.inter.net.il [84.229.153.44]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5AD2E108006C; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:01:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 16:01:13 +0200 From: Ido Schimmel To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Vivien Didelot , Jiri Pirko , Tobias Waldekranz , Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 11/12] Documentation: networking: switchdev: clarify device driver behavior Message-ID: References: <20210316112419.1304230-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20210316112419.1304230-12-olteanv@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210316112419.1304230-12-olteanv@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:24:18PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > +When the bridge has VLAN filtering enabled and a PVID is not configured on the > +ingress port, untagged 802.1p tagged packets must be dropped. When the bridge I think you meant "untagged and 802.1p tagged packets" ? Looks good otherwise > +has VLAN filtering enabled and a PVID exists on the ingress port, untagged and > +priority-tagged packets must be accepted and forwarded according to the > +bridge's port membership of the PVID VLAN. When the bridge has VLAN filtering > +disabled, the presence/lack of a PVID should not influence the packet > +forwarding decision.