From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Ariel Levkovich <lariel@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulb@nvidia.com, jiri@resnulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: act_ct: Fix ct template allocation for zone 0
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 13:40:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YK/LcLVMhFDe/7KF@horizon.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5db2e2b3-c768-661a-dc05-fa850c8d066a@nvidia.com>
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:14:21PM -0400, Ariel Levkovich wrote:
...
> I meant if there's no ct_clear action.
>
> Assume we already when through zone X in some previous action.
>
> In such case skb->_nfct has that zone's id.
>
> Now, if we go to zone=0, we skip this entirely, since p->tmpl is NULL :
>
> /* Associate skb with specified zone. */
> if (tmpl) {
> nf_conntrack_put(skb_nfct(skb));
> nf_conntrack_get(&tmpl->ct_general);
> nf_ct_set(skb, tmpl, IP_CT_NEW);
> }
>
>
> And then in nf_conntrack_in it continues with the previous zone:
>
> err = nf_conntrack_in(skb, &state)
>
> calling -> ret = resolve_normal_ct(tmpl, skb, dataoff,
> protonum, state);
>
> calling -> zone = nf_ct_zone_tmpl(tmpl, skb, &tmp);
>
>
> I encountered it by accident while running one of our test which was buggy
>
> but due to the zone=0 bug the bug in the test was hidden and test passed.
>
> Once I enabled my fix to alloc templated for zone=0 it was exposed.
>
> The test doesn't use ct_clear between zones.
I see now, thanks. When you had said without ct_clear, I thought only
about the first run through ct. Didn't think there would be this
implicit ct_clear expectation. It could also erase _nfct if zone==0,
but agree, too much especial handling for zone 0.
Seems it needs both fixes then, while this patch is good as is.
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-26 17:01 [PATCH net] net/sched: act_ct: Fix ct template allocation for zone 0 Ariel Levkovich
2021-05-27 1:49 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2021-05-27 15:36 ` Ariel Levkovich
2021-05-27 15:50 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2021-05-27 16:14 ` Ariel Levkovich
2021-05-27 16:40 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2021-05-27 22:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YK/LcLVMhFDe/7KF@horizon.localdomain \
--to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=lariel@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox