netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, borisp@nvidia.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	davejwatson@fb.com, ilyal@mellanox.com, aviadye@mellanox.com,
	Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tls: prevent oversized sendfile() hangs by ignoring MSG_MORE
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:04:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YM0KR8IPGoSBgCl8@ubuntu-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618203406.1437414-1-kuba@kernel.org>

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 01:34:06PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> We got multiple reports that multi_chunk_sendfile test
> case from tls selftest fails. This was sort of expected,
> as the original fix was never applied (see it in the first
> Link:). The test in question uses sendfile() with count
> larger than the size of the underlying file. This will
> make splice set MSG_MORE on all sendpage calls, meaning
> TLS will never close and flush the last partial record.
> 
> Eric seem to have addressed a similar problem in
> commit 35f9c09fe9c7 ("tcp: tcp_sendpages() should call tcp_push() once")
> by introducing MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST. Unlike MSG_MORE
> MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST is not set on the last call
> of a "pipefull" of data (PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS == 16,
> so every 16 pages or whenever we run out of data).
> 
> Having a break every 16 pages should be fine, TLS
> can pack exactly 4 pages into a record, so for
> aligned reads there should be no difference,
> unaligned may see one extra record per sendpage().
> 
> Sticking to TCP semantics seems preferable to modifying
> splice, but we can revisit it if real life scenarios
> show a regression.
> 
> Reported-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>
> Reported-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1591392508-14592-1-git-send-email-pooja.trivedi@stackpath.com/
> Fixes: 3c4d7559159b ("tls: kernel TLS support")
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

With this patch the muilt_chunk_sendfile selftest passes. Thanks!

Tested-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-18 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-18 20:34 [PATCH net] tls: prevent oversized sendfile() hangs by ignoring MSG_MORE Jakub Kicinski
2021-06-18 21:04 ` Seth Forshee [this message]
2021-06-21 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YM0KR8IPGoSBgCl8@ubuntu-x1 \
    --to=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
    --cc=aviadye@mellanox.com \
    --cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ilyal@mellanox.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vfedorenko@novek.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).