Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] bus: Make remove callback return void

Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-06T18:44:08Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3365 bytes --]

Hello Bjorn,

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 01:08:18PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 06 Jul 10:48 CDT 2021, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> > index c1404d3dae2c..7f6fac618ab2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> > @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_probe(struct device *dev)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static int rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> > +static void rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
> > struct rpmsg_driver *rpdrv = to_rpmsg_driver(rpdev->dev.driver);
> > @@ -546,8 +546,6 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> >
> > if (rpdev->ept)
> > rpmsg_destroy_ept(rpdev->ept);
> > -
> > - return err;
>
> This leaves err assigned but never used, but I don't mind following up
> with a patch cleaning that up after this has landed.

Ah, good catch. If I send out a v3 I will fold the following into this
patch:

diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
index 7f6fac618ab2..9151836190ce 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
@@ -534,10 +534,9 @@ static void rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
{
struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
struct rpmsg_driver *rpdrv = to_rpmsg_driver(rpdev->dev.driver);
- int err = 0;

if (rpdev->ops->announce_destroy)
- err = rpdev->ops->announce_destroy(rpdev);
+ rpdev->ops->announce_destroy(rpdev);

if (rpdrv->remove)
rpdrv->remove(rpdev);

Maybe .announce_destroy() should then be changed to return void, too?
Something like:

diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h
index a76c344253bf..d5204756714c 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct rpmsg_device_ops {
struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo);

int (*announce_create)(struct rpmsg_device *ept);
- int (*announce_destroy)(struct rpmsg_device *ept);
+ void (*announce_destroy)(struct rpmsg_device *ept);
};

/**
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
index 8e49a3bacfc7..4e05994634f8 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
return err;
}

-static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_destroy(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
+static void virtio_rpmsg_announce_destroy(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
{
struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
struct virtproc_info *vrp = vch->vrp;
@@ -360,8 +360,6 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_destroy(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
if (err)
dev_err(dev, "failed to announce service %d\n", err);
}
-
- return err;
}

static const struct rpmsg_device_ops virtio_rpmsg_ops = {

though it's not obvious for me that the last hunk is sensible. (OTOH the
return code is ignored anyhow as rpmsg_dev_remove() is the only caller.

Best regards and thanks
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]