From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Vivek Unune <npcomplete13@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lockup in phy_probe() for MDIO device (Broadcom's switch)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVWUKwEXrd39t8iw@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5715f818-a279-d514-dcac-73a94c1d30ef@gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:30:52PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 30.09.2021 12:17, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:58:21AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > > This isn't necessarily a PHY / MDIO regression. It could be some core
> > > change that exposed a PHY / MDIO bug.
> >
> > I think what's going on is that the switch device is somehow being
> > probed by phylib. It looks to me like we don't check that the mdio
> > device being matched in phy_bus_match() is actually a PHY (by
> > checking whether mdiodev->flags & MDIO_DEVICE_FLAG_PHY is true
> > before proceeding with any matching.)
> >
> > We do, however, check the driver side. This looks to me like a problem
> > especially when the mdio bus can contain a mixture of PHY devices and
> > non-PHY devices. However, I would expect this to also be blowing up in
> > the mainline kernel as well - but it doesn't seem to.
> >
> > Maybe Andrew can provide a reason why this doesn't happen - maybe we've
> > just been lucky with out-of-bounds read accesses (to the non-existent
> > phy_device wrapped around the mdio_device?)
>
> I'll see if I can use buildroot to test unmodified kernel.
>
>
> > If my theory is correct, this patch should solve your issue:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > index ba5ad86ec826..dac017174ab1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > @@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ static int phy_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > const int num_ids = ARRAY_SIZE(phydev->c45_ids.device_ids);
> > int i;
> > - if (!(phydrv->mdiodrv.flags & MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY))
> > + if (!(phydrv->mdiodrv.flags & MDIO_DEVICE_IS_PHY) ||
> > + !(phydev->mdio.flags & MDIO_DEVICE_FLAG_PHY))
> > return 0;
> > if (phydrv->match_phy_device)
> >
>
> Unfortunately this doesn't seem to help
Hmm.
In phy_probe, can you add:
WARN_ON(!(phydev->mdio.flags & MDIO_DEVICE_FLAG_PHY));
just to make sure we have a real PHY device there please? Maybe also
print the value of the flags argument.
MDIO_DEVICE_FLAG_PHY is set by phy_create_device() before the mutex is
initialised, so if it is set, the lock should be initialised.
Maybe also print mdiodev->flags in mdio_device_register() as well, so
we can see what is being registered and the flags being used for that
device.
Could it be that openwrt is carrying a patch that is causing this
issue?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-30 9:58 Lockup in phy_probe() for MDIO device (Broadcom's switch) Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-30 10:15 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-30 10:17 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-09-30 10:30 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-30 10:40 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2021-09-30 11:29 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-30 11:44 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-09-30 12:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-30 12:30 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-09-30 12:51 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-30 13:07 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-09-30 13:21 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-09-30 13:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-09-30 13:47 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-30 13:42 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-30 13:54 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-09-30 11:22 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVWUKwEXrd39t8iw@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npcomplete13@gmail.com \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).