From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us,
mkubecek@suse.cz, andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] devlink: expose get/put functions
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 08:29:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YX43wGPh5+TcXR81@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211030171851.1822583-4-kuba@kernel.org>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 10:18:50AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Allow those who hold implicit reference on a devlink instance
> to try to take a full ref on it. This will be used from netdev
> code which has an implicit ref because of driver call ordering.
>
> Note that after recent changes devlink_unregister() may happen
> before netdev unregister, but devlink_free() should still happen
> after, so we are safe to try, but we can't just refcount_inc()
> and assume it's not zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/net/devlink.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> net/core/devlink.c | 8 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
I really like this series, but your latest netdevsim RFC made me worry.
It is important to make sure that these devlink_put() and devlink_get()
calls will be out-of-reach from the drivers. Only core code should use
them.
Can you please add it as a comment above these functions?
At least for now, till we discuss your RFC.
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Thanks
>
> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
> index 1b1317d378de..991ce48f77ca 100644
> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> @@ -1726,6 +1726,9 @@ devlink_trap_policers_unregister(struct devlink *devlink,
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK)
>
> +struct devlink *__must_check devlink_try_get(struct devlink *devlink);
> +void devlink_put(struct devlink *devlink);
> +
> void devlink_compat_running_version(struct net_device *dev,
> char *buf, size_t len);
> int devlink_compat_flash_update(struct net_device *dev, const char *file_name);
> @@ -1736,6 +1739,15 @@ int devlink_compat_switch_id_get(struct net_device *dev,
>
> #else
>
> +static inline struct devlink *devlink_try_get(struct devlink *devlink)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void devlink_put(struct devlink *devlink)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static inline void
> devlink_compat_running_version(struct net_device *dev, char *buf, size_t len)
> {
> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> index 2d8abe88c673..100d87fd3f65 100644
> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> @@ -182,15 +182,17 @@ struct net *devlink_net(const struct devlink *devlink)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_net);
>
> -static void devlink_put(struct devlink *devlink)
> +void devlink_put(struct devlink *devlink)
> {
> if (refcount_dec_and_test(&devlink->refcount))
> complete(&devlink->comp);
> }
>
> -static bool __must_check devlink_try_get(struct devlink *devlink)
> +struct devlink *__must_check devlink_try_get(struct devlink *devlink)
> {
> - return refcount_inc_not_zero(&devlink->refcount);
> + if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&devlink->refcount))
> + return devlink;
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> static struct devlink *devlink_get_from_attrs(struct net *net,
> --
> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-31 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-30 17:18 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] improve ethtool/rtnl vs devlink locking Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-30 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] ethtool: push the rtnl_lock into dev_ethtool() Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-31 6:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-10-30 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] ethtool: handle info/flash data copying outside rtnl_lock Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-31 6:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-10-30 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] devlink: expose get/put functions Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-31 6:29 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-11-01 13:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-01 18:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-10-30 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ethtool: don't drop the rtnl_lock half way thru the ioctl Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-31 6:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-01 13:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] improve ethtool/rtnl vs devlink locking patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YX43wGPh5+TcXR81@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).