netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: mv88e6240 configuration broken for B850v3
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 20:07:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya5tkXU3AXalFRg2@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211206193730.oubyveywniyvptfk@skbuf>

On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 09:37:30PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 07:24:56PM +0000, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > Yes, that appears to also make it work.
> > 
> > Martyn
> 
> Well, I just pointed out what the problem is, I don't know how to solve
> it, honest! :)
> 
> It's clear that the code is wrong, because it's in an "if" block that
> checks for "of_phy_is_fixed_link(dp->dn) || phy_np" but then it omits
> the "phy_np" part of it. On the other hand we can't just go ahead and
> say "if (phy_np) mode = MLO_AN_PHY; else mode = MLO_AN_FIXED;" because
> MLO_AN_INBAND is also a valid option that we may be omitting. So we'd
> have to duplicate part of the logic from phylink_parse_mode(), which
> does not appear ideal at all. What would be ideal is if this fabricated
> phylink call would not be done at all, but I don't know enough about the
> systems that need it, I expect Andrew knows more.

It's needed because otherwise we end up reconfiguring a CPU link while
it is still "up". Phylink's initial mode is "link down" and the phylink
design is such that it guarantees that we will not call mac_link_down()
unless the link was previously up. This is true of all network drivers,
but was found to be false for some DSA drivers, and some DSA broke as
a result.

My conclusion from having read this thread is the CPU port is using PPU
polling, meaning that in mac_link_up():

        if ((!mv88e6xxx_phy_is_internal(ds, port) &&
             !mv88e6xxx_port_ppu_updates(chip, port)) ||
            mode == MLO_AN_FIXED) {

is false - because mv88e6xxx_port_ppu_updates() returns true, and
consequently we never undo this force-down. On Marvell hardware, the
PPU updating effectively makes it appear as an in-band link as the
hardware fetches the PHY status to the MAC by polling the PHY.

What we do elsewhere is we handle the link-up-down-forcing in
mac_config appropriate to the mode, and we already do that in Marvell
DSA:

        /* Undo the forced down state above after completing configuration
         * irrespective of its state on entry, which allows the link to come up.         */
        if (mode == MLO_AN_INBAND && p->interface != state->interface &&
            chip->info->ops->port_set_link)
                chip->info->ops->port_set_link(chip, port, LINK_UNFORCED);

I'm thinking this needs set LINK_UNFORCED here if the PPU is polling
and we're in MLO_AN_PHY mode:

	if (((mode == MLO_AN_INBAND && p->interface != state->interface) ||
	     (mode == MLO_AN_PHY && mv88e6xxx_port_ppu_updates(chip, port))) &&
	    chip->info->ops->port_set_link)
		chip->info->ops->port_set_link(chip, port, LINK_UNFORCED);

What I don't know is whether that mv88e6xxx_port_ppu_updates() 
should be mv88e6xxx_phy_is_internal() || mv88e6xxx_port_ppu_updates(),
at which point introducing a helper for that would probably be a good
idea, or it might be simpler to use the new phylink_get_caps() ability
to set phylink_config.ovr_an_inband for the internal/ppu polled ports
if they're not operating in fixed link mode. This is essentially what
is going on here - the PPU polling is just a way of replicating SGMII's
propagation of the PHY status to the MAC.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-06 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03  9:06 mv88e6240 configuration broken for B850v3 Martyn Welch
2021-12-03 16:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-06 17:44   ` Martyn Welch
2021-12-06 18:26     ` Martyn Welch
2021-12-06 18:31       ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-06 18:37         ` Martyn Welch
2021-12-06 18:50           ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-06 19:24             ` Martyn Welch
2021-12-06 19:37               ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-06 19:53                 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-06 20:01                   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-06 20:18                     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-06 20:29                       ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-07 14:09                         ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-06 21:44                       ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-06 22:13                         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-06 20:07                 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2021-12-06 20:23                   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-06 20:51                     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-06 21:13                       ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-06 21:27                         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-06 21:49                           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-06 23:27                             ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-07  0:58                               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-07 13:24                                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-07 13:59                                   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-07 14:37                                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-07 14:53                                       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-06 21:51                           ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-06 22:17                             ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-06 22:22                             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-06 23:44                               ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-07  2:06                                 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-07 12:48                                   ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ya5tkXU3AXalFRg2@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=martyn.welch@collabora.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).