From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf, x64: Replace some stack_size usage with offset variables
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:25:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya9uv+KdwKiTXt6/@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzYGKW1mJ28TtL3iD5-AcDb+Ua0aqPAdnPjtbneEZqyr2A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 01:41:15PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 6:07 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > As suggested by Andrii, adding variables for registers and ip
> > address offsets, which makes the code more clear, rather than
> > abusing single stack_size variable for everything.
> >
> > Also describing the stack layout in the comment.
> >
> > There is no function change.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > index 1d7b0c69b644..b106e80e8d9c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > @@ -1941,7 +1941,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
> > void *orig_call)
> > {
> > int ret, i, nr_args = m->nr_args;
> > - int stack_size = nr_args * 8;
> > + int regs_off, ip_off, stack_size = nr_args * 8;
> > struct bpf_tramp_progs *fentry = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
> > struct bpf_tramp_progs *fexit = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
> > struct bpf_tramp_progs *fmod_ret = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
> > @@ -1956,14 +1956,33 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
> > if (!is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(flags))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > + /* Generated trampoline stack layout:
> > + *
> > + * RBP + 8 [ return address ]
> > + * RBP + 0 [ RBP ]
> > + *
> > + * RBP - 8 [ return value ] BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG or
> > + * BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET flags
> > + *
> > + * [ reg_argN ] always
> > + * [ ... ]
> > + * RBP - regs_off [ reg_arg1 ]
> > + *
>
> I think it's also worth mentioning that context passed into
> fentry/fexit programs are pointing here (makes it a bit easier to
> track those ctx[-1] and ctx[-2] in the next patch.
ok, jirka
>
>
> > + * RBP - ip_off [ traced function ] BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG flag
> > + */
> > +
> > /* room for return value of orig_call or fentry prog */
> > save_ret = flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG | BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET);
> > if (save_ret)
> > stack_size += 8;
> >
> > + regs_off = stack_size;
> > +
> > if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG)
> > stack_size += 8; /* room for IP address argument */
> >
> > + ip_off = stack_size;
> > +
>
> [...]
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-04 14:06 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Add helpers to access traced function arguments Jiri Olsa
2021-12-04 14:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf, x64: Replace some stack_size usage with offset variables Jiri Olsa
2021-12-06 19:19 ` John Fastabend
2021-12-06 21:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-06 21:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-07 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-12-04 14:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Add get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpers Jiri Olsa
2021-12-06 19:39 ` John Fastabend
2021-12-06 20:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-12-06 21:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-07 17:23 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-12-04 14:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add tests for " Jiri Olsa
2021-12-06 22:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-07 18:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-12-07 22:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-12-08 16:38 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ya9uv+KdwKiTXt6/@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).