From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: prefer 1000baseT over 1000baseKX
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:43:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbDgoKICfdKA9Cs7@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1muvFO-00F6jY-1K@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 11:36:30AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> The PHY settings table is supposed to be sorted by descending match
> priority - in other words, earlier entries are preferred over later
> entries.
>
> The order of 1000baseKX/Full and 1000baseT/Full is such that we
> prefer 1000baseKX/Full over 1000baseT/Full, but 1000baseKX/Full is
> a lot rarer than 1000baseT/Full, and thus is much less likely to
> be preferred.
>
> This causes phylink problems - it means a fixed link specifying a
> speed of 1G and full duplex gets an ethtool linkmode of 1000baseKX/Full
> rather than 1000baseT/Full as would be expected - and since we offer
> userspace a software emulation of a conventional copper PHY, we want
> to offer copper modes in preference to anything else. However, we do
> still want to allow the rarer modes as well.
>
> Hence, let's reorder these two modes to prefer copper.
>
> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-08 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-08 11:36 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: prefer 1000baseT over 1000baseKX Russell King (Oracle)
2021-12-08 16:43 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2021-12-08 22:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-09 20:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbDgoKICfdKA9Cs7@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).