Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
Cc: magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: add test for tx_writeable to batched path
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:27:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ybip7mXZuCXYTlwn@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214102647.7734-1-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:26:47AM +0100, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> 
> Add a test for the tx_writeable condition to the batched Tx processing
> path. This test is in the skb and non-batched code paths but not in the
> batched code path. So add it there. This test makes sure that a
> process is not woken up until there are a sufficiently large number of
> free entries in the Tx ring. Currently, any driver using the batched
> interface will be woken up even if there is only one free entry,
> impacting performance negatively.

I gave this patch a shot on ice driver with the Tx batching patch that i'm
about to send which is using the xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(). I ran
the 2 core setup with no busy poll and it turned out that this change has
a negative impact on performance - it degrades by 5%.

After a short chat with Magnus he said it's due to the touch to the global
state of a ring that xsk_tx_writeable() is doing.

So maintainers, please do not apply this yet, we'll come up with a
solution.

Also, should this be sent to bpf tree (not bpf-next) ?

Thanks!

> 
> Fixes: 3413f04141aa ("xsk: Change the tx writeable condition")
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> ---
>  net/xdp/xsk.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> index 28ef3f4465ae..3772fcaa76ed 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> @@ -392,7 +392,8 @@ u32 xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xdp_desc *
>  
>  	xskq_cons_release_n(xs->tx, nb_pkts);
>  	__xskq_cons_release(xs->tx);
> -	xs->sk.sk_write_space(&xs->sk);
> +	if (xsk_tx_writeable(xs))
> +		xs->sk.sk_write_space(&xs->sk);
>  
>  out:
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> 
> base-commit: d27a662290963a1cde26cdfdbac71a546c06e94a
> -- 
> 2.29.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-14 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-14 10:26 [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: add test for tx_writeable to batched path Magnus Karlsson
2021-12-14 14:27 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2021-12-14 14:29   ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-12-14 14:35     ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ybip7mXZuCXYTlwn@boxer \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox