From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: "Ismail, Mohammad Athari" <mohammad.athari.ismail@intel.com>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Voon, Weifeng" <weifeng.voon@intel.com>,
"Wong, Vee Khee" <vee.khee.wong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] net: phy: genphy_loopback: add link speed configuration
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:55:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ybm7jVwNfj01b7S4@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB47715A9B7ADB8AF36066DCE6D5769@CO1PR11MB4771.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 5:23 PM
> > To: Ismail, Mohammad Athari <mohammad.athari.ismail@intel.com>
> > Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>;
> > Wong, Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [BUG] net: phy: genphy_loopback: add link speed configuration
> >
> > > Thanks for the suggestion. The proposed solution also doesn't work. Still
> > get -110 error.
> >
> > Please can you trace where this -110 comes from. Am i looking at the wrong
> > poll call?
>
> I did read the ret value from genphy_soft_reset() and phy_read_poll_timeout().
> The -110 came from phy_read_poll_timeout().
O.K.
Does the PHY actually do loopback, despite the -110?
I'm wondering if we should ignore the return value from
phy_read_poll_timeout().
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-15 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-14 7:00 [BUG] net: phy: genphy_loopback: add link speed configuration Ismail, Mohammad Athari
2021-12-14 9:39 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-15 8:36 ` Ismail, Mohammad Athari
2021-12-15 9:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-12-15 9:35 ` Ismail, Mohammad Athari
2021-12-15 9:55 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2021-12-15 15:03 ` Ismail, Mohammad Athari
2021-12-20 11:11 ` Ismail, Mohammad Athari
2021-12-20 15:13 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ybm7jVwNfj01b7S4@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mohammad.athari.ismail@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vee.khee.wong@intel.com \
--cc=weifeng.voon@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).