netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: dev: Remove the preempt_disable() in netif_rx_internal().
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 13:17:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfvH9YpKTIU4EByk@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v8xwb1o9.fsf@toke.dk>

On 2022-02-03 13:00:06 [+0100], Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > Here is the code in larger context:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> >     if (static_branch_unlikely(&rps_needed)) {
> >         struct rps_dev_flow voidflow, *rflow = &voidflow;
> >         int cpu;
> >
> >         preempt_disable();
> >         rcu_read_lock();
> >
> >         cpu = get_rps_cpu(skb->dev, skb, &rflow);
> >         if (cpu < 0)
> >             cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >
> >         ret = enqueue_to_backlog(skb, cpu, &rflow->last_qtail);
> >
> >         rcu_read_unlock();
> >         preempt_enable();
> >     } else
> > #endif
> >
> > This code needs the preempt_disable().
> 
> This is mostly so that the CPU ID stays the same throughout that section
> of code, though, right? So wouldn't it work to replace the
> preempt_disable() with a migrate_disable()? That should keep _RT happy,
> no?

It would but as mentioned previously: BH is disabled and
smp_processor_id() is stable.

> -Toke

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-03 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-02 12:28 [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: dev: PREEMPT_RT fixups Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-02 12:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: dev: Remove the preempt_disable() in netif_rx_internal() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-02 17:10   ` Eric Dumazet
2022-02-03 12:00     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-02-03 12:17       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-02-03 12:41         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-02-03 15:50           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-04 15:20           ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: dev: Remove preempt_disable() and get_cpu() " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-04 16:31             ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-02-04 16:42               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-04 16:32             ` Eric Dumazet
2022-02-03 12:16     ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: dev: Remove the preempt_disable() " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-02 12:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dev: Remove get_cpu() " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-02 17:14   ` Eric Dumazet
2022-02-03 12:14   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-02-02 12:28 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dev: Makes sure netif_rx() can be invoked in any context Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-02 16:50   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-02-03 12:20     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-03 19:38       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-02-02 17:43   ` Eric Dumazet
2022-02-03 12:19     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-02-03 15:10     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-03 15:25       ` Eric Dumazet
2022-02-03 15:40         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-03 16:18           ` Eric Dumazet
2022-02-03 16:44             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-03 17:45               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-04 13:00             ` [PATCH net-next v2 " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-04 18:46               ` Eric Dumazet
2022-02-02 12:28 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: dev: Make rps_lock() disable interrupts Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-02 16:47   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-02-03 16:41     ` [PATCH net-next v2 " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-03 19:39       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-02-02 16:14 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: dev: PREEMPT_RT fixups Jakub Kicinski
2022-02-03 11:59   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfvH9YpKTIU4EByk@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=toke@toke.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).