From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
brouer@redhat.com, toke@redhat.com, andrii@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftest/bpf: check invalid length in test_xdp_update_frags
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 18:53:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgFcn487ZHk8e2VP@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c03f0c81-8e56-6c92-d31a-03a5394b9388@fb.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3268 bytes --]
>
>
> On 2/4/22 11:08 AM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In kernel, the nr_frags checking is against MAX_SKB_FRAGS,
> > > > > > but if /proc/sys/net/core/max_skb_flags is 2 or more less
> > > > > > than MAX_SKB_FRAGS, the test won't fail, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, you are right. Should we use the same definition used in
> > > > > include/linux/skbuff.h instead? Something like:
> > > > >
> > > > > if (65536 / page_size + 1 < 16)
> > > > > max_skb_flags = 16;
> > > > > else
> > > > > max_skb_flags = 65536/page_size + 1;
> > > >
> > > > The maximum packet size limit 64KB won't change anytime soon.
> > > > So the above should work. Some comments to explain why using
> > > > the above formula will be good.
> > >
> > > ack, I will do in v2.
> >
> > I can see there is a on-going discussion here [0] about increasing
> > MAX_SKB_FRAGS. I guess we can put on-hold this patch and see how
> > MAX_SKB_FRAGS will be changed.
>
> Thanks for the link. The new patch is going to increase
> MAX_SKB_FRAGS and it is possible that will be changed again
> (maybe under some config options).
>
> The default value for
> /proc/sys/net/core/max_skb_flags is MAX_SKB_FRAGS and I suspect
> anybody is bothering to change it. So your patch is okay to me.
> Maybe change a little bit -ENOMEM error message. current,
> ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOMEM, "unsupported buffer size");
> to
> ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOMEM, "unsupported buffer size, possible non-default
> /proc/sys/net/core/max_skb_flags?");
ack, I am fine with it.
@Alexei, Andrii: any hints about it?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lorenzo
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202202031315.B425Ipe8-lkp@intel.com/t/#ma1b2c7e71fe9bc69e24642a62dadf32fda7d5f03
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Lorenzo
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Lorenzo
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + num = fscanf(f, "%d", &max_skb_frags);
> > > > > > > + fclose(f);
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(num, 1, "max_skb_frags read failed"))
> > > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + /* xdp_buff linear area size is always set to 4096 in the
> > > > > > > + * bpf_prog_test_run_xdp routine.
> > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > + buf_size = 4096 + (max_skb_frags + 1) * sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);
> > > > > > > + buf = malloc(buf_size);
> > > > > > > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "alloc buf"))
> > > > > > > + goto out;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + memset(buf, 0, buf_size);
> > > > > > > + offset = (__u32 *)buf;
> > > > > > > + *offset = 16;
> > > > > > > + buf[*offset] = 0xaa;
> > > > > > > + buf[*offset + 15] = 0xaa;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + topts.data_in = buf;
> > > > > > > + topts.data_out = buf;
> > > > > > > + topts.data_size_in = buf_size;
> > > > > > > + topts.data_size_out = buf_size;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
> > > > > > > + ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOMEM, "unsupported buffer size");
> > > > > > > + free(buf);
> > > > > > > out:
> > > > > > > bpf_object__close(obj);
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-07 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-04 13:58 [PATCH bpf-next] selftest/bpf: check invalid length in test_xdp_update_frags Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-02-04 17:37 ` Yonghong Song
2022-02-04 17:52 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-02-04 18:14 ` Yonghong Song
2022-02-04 18:30 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-02-04 19:08 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-02-07 17:08 ` Yonghong Song
2022-02-07 17:53 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgFcn487ZHk8e2VP@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).