From: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Avoid overwriting the copies of clcsock callback functions
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:50:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgR9XrT8cATDP4Zx@TonyMac-Alibaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1644415853-46641-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 10:10:53PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
> The callback functions of clcsock will be saved and replaced during
> the fallback. But if the fallback happens more than once, then the
> copies of these callback functions will be overwritten incorrectly,
> resulting in a loop call issue:
>
> clcsk->sk_error_report
> |- smc_fback_error_report() <------------------------------|
> |- smc_fback_forward_wakeup() | (loop)
> |- clcsock_callback() (incorrectly overwritten) |
> |- smc->clcsk_error_report() ------------------|
>
> So this patch fixes the issue by saving these function pointers only
> once in the fallback and avoiding overwriting.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+4de3c0e8a263e1e499bc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 341adeec9ada ("net/smc: Forward wakeup to smc socket waitqueue after fallback")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0000000000006d045e05d78776f6@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> net/smc/af_smc.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index 8c89d0b..306d9e8c 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -667,14 +667,17 @@ static void smc_fback_error_report(struct sock *clcsk)
> static int smc_switch_to_fallback(struct smc_sock *smc, int reason_code)
> {
> struct sock *clcsk;
> + int rc = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
> if (!smc->clcsock) {
> - mutex_unlock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
> - return -EBADF;
> + rc = -EBADF;
> + goto out;
> }
> clcsk = smc->clcsock->sk;
>
> + if (smc->use_fallback)
> + goto out;
> smc->use_fallback = true;
I am wondering that there is a potential racing. If ->use_fallback is
setted to true, but the rest of replacing process is on the way, others
who tested and passed ->use_fallback, they would get old value before
replacing.
Thanks,
Tony Lu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-09 14:10 [PATCH net] net/smc: Avoid overwriting the copies of clcsock callback functions Wen Gu
2022-02-10 2:50 ` Tony Lu [this message]
2022-02-10 8:56 ` Wen Gu
2022-02-11 2:32 ` Tony Lu
2022-02-11 12:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgR9XrT8cATDP4Zx@TonyMac-Alibaba \
--to=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).