netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vhost: Protect the virtqueue from being cleared whilst still in use
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 10:07:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh9B+wKDKXHZ6ly/@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220302093446.pjq3djoqi434ehz4@sgarzare-redhat>

On Wed, 02 Mar 2022, Stefano Garzarella wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:54:21AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick() already holds the mutex during its call
> > to vhost_get_vq_desc().  All we have to do is take the same lock
> > during virtqueue clean-up and we mitigate the reported issues.
> > 
> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=279432d30d825e63ba00
> 
> This issue is similar to [1] that should be already fixed upstream by [2].
> 
> However I think this patch would have prevented some issues, because
> vhost_vq_reset() sets vq->private to NULL, preventing the worker from
> running.
> 
> Anyway I think that when we enter in vhost_dev_cleanup() the worker should
> be already stopped, so it shouldn't be necessary to take the mutex. But in
> order to prevent future issues maybe it's better to take them, so:


> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

Thanks for the analysis and the review Stefano.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-02 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-02  7:54 [PATCH 1/1] vhost: Protect the virtqueue from being cleared whilst still in use Lee Jones
2022-03-02  9:34 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 10:07   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2022-03-02 13:35   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 14:11     ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 14:50       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 15:36         ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-04 16:46           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 13:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 13:56   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 14:51     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 14:57       ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 16:28         ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 16:30           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 16:49             ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 17:10               ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-03 14:17                 ` Lee Jones
2022-03-04  5:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-04 15:22   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-04 16:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-04 16:56   ` Lee Jones
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-07 19:17 Lee Jones
2022-03-07 19:33 ` Greg KH
2022-03-07 22:39   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08  8:10   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  8:11     ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  8:57     ` Greg KH
2022-03-08  9:15       ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  9:57         ` Greg KH
2022-03-08 10:08           ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 10:55           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 11:45             ` Greg KH
2022-03-08 12:27               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 13:17                 ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 17:17                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 11:05       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-09 18:52       ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-07 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08  8:01   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 11:07     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08  6:15 ` Jason Wang
2022-03-08  8:08   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 11:06     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-14  8:43 Lee Jones
2022-03-14  8:56 ` Greg KH
2022-03-14 11:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-14 12:47   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yh9B+wKDKXHZ6ly/@google.com \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).