From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020C4C433EF for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 19:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241562AbiCNTLu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:11:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238927AbiCNTLt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:11:49 -0400 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6C531DD5 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9FB3201F7B; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:10:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Cd9upb1DbLZxQlyaD 23feLoTc3LYvNE+vPS9//nFmoI=; b=eIMNhe3BXvOCvlP5Pmki6hdpFhkIj2Fye 8lZ+u8YxXDjevmUWnmyJvuGYCOgiP2T8JDV9CGuWSXWrdTLXdX3XLntcQS/tmJPy 4Sk/8sTwh2/QQQgrRjUAuCCY2If5nTkscMYmoMOeASz3F8wZ34hTlCs/t90f/zYv DBMhg7YKpFJh981+jybjvwx6ELDS/Ixgl2tJfb8t91VgZzl3Gyz6qf3LqJuhpEjc 6eHn05X2+JmaxpDb+qxAjLtf4iOFG2z0XO97zJKTKHvlI6Hr5FDvzRHcBZvyVK25 Evg7pPcBV4puKB5c3xQI+/aAnxRmdNif1FhLoDyp3hAvQ8SimFd3g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddvkedguddulecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepkfguohcu ufgthhhimhhmvghluceoihguohhstghhsehiughoshgthhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptdffkeekfeduffevgeeujeffjefhtefgueeugfevtdeiheduueeukefhudeh leetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepih guohhstghhsehiughoshgthhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:10:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 21:10:31 +0200 From: Ido Schimmel To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: idosch@nvidia.com, petrm@nvidia.com, simon.horman@corigine.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, leonro@nvidia.com, jiri@resnulli.us, Michael Chan Subject: Re: [RFT net-next 0/6] devlink: expose instance locking and simplify port splitting Message-ID: References: <20220310001632.470337-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20220314114645.5708bf90@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220314114645.5708bf90@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:46:45AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 23:13:02 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote: > > Went over the patches and they look good to me. Thanks again. Will run a > > full regression with them on Sunday. > > Hi Ido, no news? Sorry, forgot to update you. All the tests passed :) > > Do you have a preference for these patches getting merged for 5.18 > or waiting after the merge window? IOW I'm wondering if it's more > beneficial for potential backports / out-of-tree builds to have the > ability to lock the devlink instance in 5.18 already or to do as much > of the conversions as possible in a single release (that'd mean waiting > for 5.19)? > > If there's no clear preference I'll go for 5.18. 5.18 is fine by me. Thanks!