public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: mattias.forsblad+netdev@gmail.com
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: bridge: Implement bridge flag local_receive
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 18:29:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yi9tgOQ32q2l2TxD@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96845833-8c17-04ab-2586-5005d27e1077@gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:27:25AM +0100, Mattias Forsblad wrote:
> On 2022-03-01 23:36, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > On 1 March 2022 17:43:27 CET, Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 01:31:02PM +0100, Mattias Forsblad wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> >>> index e0c13fcc50ed..5864b61157d3 100644
> >>> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> >>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> >>> @@ -163,6 +163,9 @@ int br_handle_frame_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
> >>>  		break;
> >>>  	}
> >>>  
> >>> +	if (local_rcv && !br_opt_get(br, BROPT_LOCAL_RECEIVE))
> >>> +		local_rcv = false;
> >>> +
> >>
> >> I don't think the description in the commit message is accurate:
> >> "packets received on bridge ports will not be forwarded up". From the
> >> code it seems that if packets hit a local FDB entry, then they will be
> >> "forwarded up". Instead, it seems that packets will not be flooded
> >> towards the bridge. In which case, why not maintain the same granularity
> >> we have for the rest of the ports and split this into unicast /
> >> multicast / broadcast?
> >>
> > 
> > Exactly my first thought - why not implement the same control for the bridge?
> > Also try to minimize the fast-path hit, you can keep the needed changes 
> > localized only to the cases where they are needed.
> > I'll send a few more comments in a reply to the patch.
> > 
> 
> Soo, if I understand you correctly, you want to have three different options?
> local_receive_unicast
> local_receive_multicast
> local_receive_broadcast

My understanding of the feature is that you want to prevent flooding
towards the bridge. In which case, it makes sense to keep the same
granularity as for regular bridge ports and also name the options
similarly. We already have several options that are applicable to both
the bridge and bridge ports (e.g., 'mcast_router').

I suggest:

$ ip link help bridge
Usage: ... bridge [ fdb_flush ]
                  ...
                  [ flood {on | off} ]
                  [ mcast_flood {on | off} ]
                  [ bcast_flood {on | off} ]

This is consistent with "bridge_slave".

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-14 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-01 12:31 [PATCH net-next 0/3] bridge: dsa: switchdev: mv88e6xxx: Implement local_receive bridge flag Mattias Forsblad
2022-03-01 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: bridge: Implement bridge flag local_receive Mattias Forsblad
2022-03-01 16:43   ` Ido Schimmel
2022-03-01 22:36     ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-03-02  6:27       ` Mattias Forsblad
2022-03-14 16:29         ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2022-03-14 16:33           ` Ido Schimmel
2022-03-14 16:48           ` Mattias Forsblad
2022-03-02  3:25     ` Roopa Prabhu
2022-03-01 22:43   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-03-02  6:33     ` Mattias Forsblad
2022-03-02  6:38     ` Mattias Forsblad
2022-03-01 12:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] dsa: Handle the local_receive flag in the DSA layer Mattias Forsblad
2022-03-01 12:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] mv88e6xxx: Offload the local_receive flag Mattias Forsblad
2022-03-02 12:19   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-02 13:30   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-01 17:14 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] bridge: dsa: switchdev: mv88e6xxx: Implement local_receive bridge flag Florian Fainelli
2022-03-01 21:04   ` Tobias Waldekranz
2022-03-17 14:05     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-18  7:58       ` Tobias Waldekranz
2022-03-18 11:11         ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-18 12:09           ` Tobias Waldekranz
2022-03-18 12:44             ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-18 16:03               ` Tobias Waldekranz
2022-03-18 16:26                 ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yi9tgOQ32q2l2TxD@shredder \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mattias.forsblad+netdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox